Consumers requesting a product from a company excuses that company from mistakes it makes.

Then the Internet threw a hissy fit about being forced to buy a peripheral 90% of the community had no interest in.

Actually the VR community is looking at it as a useful peripheral for the Oculus Rift. The ability to use gesture commands while in a VR application could come in really handy as well as allowing you to be able to 'see' yourself.

Does anyone know why PSN is often in the news for these kinds of attacks

Intel's got a line of them called NUC computers.

"Real money" also has the weight of the government that printed it behind it.

That's funny, it sure looks real in my wallet.

Except "real money" can be used to buy things.

The devs have stated that it would be a terrible idea to set the game during this period so I doubt it will happen.

Actually the first humans were just as smart as we are today, they just didn't know as much.

And let's be honest, Thomas Jane was absolutely amazing as Frank Castle.

Not really a horrible person, just one of those contrary assholes that has to shit on things.

Read the article again, he was clearly talking about the original announcement.

Spencer wouldn't elaborate on how big of a window he paid for. "There are certain things I'm just not going to talk about because it's a business deal between us and then. Obviously the deal does have a duration. I didn't buy the IP in perpetuity."

Your argument is literally: "My opinion matters more than yours."

Doesn't matter what you think. I think this is a benefit to me, therefore your argument, that it has no benefit for anyone, is invalid.

Except those of us that remember working on ideal builds for Diablo 2 and having to distrust anything others showed off in the forums because of duping and hex editors.

You said there were no benefits to always online, this is one of those things you said don't exist.

Nope, that's called an exploit.

LED track lighting.