I mean, I want to support this, but do they really have to trot out the tired line about mothers, sisters, wives, etc.? Like women are still people even if they’re not directly related to you.

So essentially when he was forced to view her body as a real thing that might encounter problems and eventually break down, rather than an object for his viewing pleasure, he cut and run?

It’s literally they’re fucking job to do so. Since when do victims need to teach the people who have promised to serve and protect them how to do just that?

Contact both the authorities who will ostensibly take care of you, and contact the company so they can get that person off the road and prevent further attacks. Why is that a hard concept?

Some do. Plenty don’t. And even if cops take it seriously, rape is often handled with eyerolls and disbelief in the court system. So any time someone dismissively suggests that people need to just trust judges and police, I have a hard time letting that go without comment. Because I’ve seen first-hand just how…

As I’ve now said several times, I expect that people are reporting to the company and the cops. People should report their sexual assaults. I’m not advising against that anywhere in this thread.

They weakly explained the use of rape. They did not explain the many uses of assault and sexual assault. Those aren’t really typos or colloquialisms.

The company should make sure that known rapists are not luring customers with their name. It still does not mean anyone is avoiding trying to prosecute the criminal. Ask yourself why you’re working so hard to deny that this could be true.

Broooo the Leafs are being assaulted by that ref!

And I did say that there’s no proof these people did not go to the police. But as someone who worked at a rape shelter for a year, allow me to assure you: the police often have to be forced to do their jobs when it comes to sexual assault. A woman reporting alone is very likely to be dissuaded by police from going to…

It is bad that they will not investigate their drivers raping people and continuing to drive with their app. Do you really need to be convinced of that?

Even if you remove usage of the word rape, assault and sexual assault are not typically thrown around casually.

Why? It’s pretty clear Uber is lying from what I read.

Get ready for this user to claim rape isn’t that widespread an issue, or that these people were probably just trying to get free fare.

Reporting the incident to the company doesn’t prove they didn’t report it to the police. But it’s cute that you seem to think the police act much differently than the company did here. At least Uber didn’t invalidate the claim based on what the person was wearing.

Ann Coulter?

Nah. He just knows not to use his indoor words on TV.

Bernie: Dumbledore.

I mean, if they feel entitled to referee every woman’s uterus, why not a Presidential election?

All I know is