MISS PIGGY: No, no, it’s from this cheap ring.
MISS PIGGY: No, no, it’s from this cheap ring.
It’s not hate, it’s amusement - they always set unrealistically high expectations for their squad and it’s hilarious each time they fail to reach them.
Didn’t they switch Iceland and Greenland’s names to trick invaders? Maybe they managed to do something similar with the goal and...whatever it is that’s thirty feet to the right of the goal.
That game sucked. I haven’t seen that much exaggerated flopping since the swimming pool scene in Showgirls.
I like Messi fine, but he ABSOLUTELY choked. Getting stopped by the keeper is excusable, but missing the frame entirely is choking, plain and simple.
He was the only one who missed the frame entirely on his PK attempt, no?
No, it’s more like they have ONE writer with multiple personality disorder. Like, in this article he signs his name “Kevin Draper” and cheers for the Warriors, but in another one he calls himself “Drew Magary” and cheers for poop.
Well, at least *I* got the pun. Good job, good effort.
Make sure to claim that everything you produce is “curated”.
So dark, so brilliant.
Instead of getting upset at the goaltending truthers, I need to take great joy in the fact that they’re the ones who are upset.
They would probably work a little more efficiently if they tried to relax first.
Agreed, I think that should be number 3.
I’d go as high as #2. Ray Allen in Game 6 gets the number one spot.
His back hand actually hits the rim pretty hard. It’s not goaltending, as some idiots are asserting (just read the rules; once he makes the initial block it’s fine) but he certainly makes contact.
When factoring in the situation, I’d say it was one of the top 5 greatest plays in basketball history, with number one going to Ray Allen in Game 6.
You’re a professional writer, Tom. It’s “complement”.
Dellavedova looks and dresses like a guy who won a Bud Light contest where the prize was that he gets to spend a night celebrating with the Cavaliers. Plays like it, too.
Damn, that’s a big room!
No no, you’re thinking of “asymmetrical warfare”.