The issue is context. A shotgun shouldn’t inherently be better than a sniper rifle because that makes no sense and is a weird way to phrase things. Guns are killing tools designed for a context. A shotgun up close should be better than a sniper rifle up close pragmatically, though landing a shot with a sniper rifle up…

Players are often opting for assault rifles over the other weapons in the game in all forms of conflict. Apparently, this goes against the design goals of the team, and in the post they explicitly mention that the team’s “goal is to make it so no one gun will feel objectively better than the others.”

The game is currently $25 on Steam. I suspect I know the answer but if you buy this, you only buy a copy for yourself, right? I’d have to convince a friend of mine to spend $25 on what is essentially a single-mode party game?

Don’t get me wrong: I’m buying it.

I don’t think you can compare Overwatch and Battleborn too well. They were both based off the same concept and still sort of are, but had wildly different approaches to how they handled every facet of the game. I still think Battleborn could have competed well against Overwatch if it were similar or at least toned…

Doesn’t even matter. I’m fairly good with Sombra and I spent a lot of time playing her. They buffed her for what, 3 weeks? Then they nerfed her ability to hack people in the same patch they made Mei even worse.

This is hard to watch, honestly. Bleszinski was a pioneer. Now he’s bringing us yesteryear’s game.

You don’t have to be sure in this case. You just have not to watch it.

Most bakeries I know of will make a few cupcakes for sale during the day and do wholesale orders otherwise. It’s not like they stock up to sell cupcakes like they’re coffees.

My thoughts are thus: we only really care when it’s about rap music. No one gets upset if the topic is Huckleberry Finn, and actually people are (rightfully) more offended if the word is taken out. It’s mostly pertinent to rap then.

I’m not gonna tell anybody.

Well done.

There’s something fundamentally wrong with the presentation but most sports are boring. A soccer goal without standing crowds is boring too.

You’re not very good at expressing your own opinion then. You wrote:

So your gripe about industry exploitation is that you in your little position will be affected? That’s rather selfish, and it’s exactly what companies want you to do. They don’t want you working together.

That’s far too narrow to be said aloud.

Unions aren’t for the untermensch just because you saw black-and-white photos in your history textbook. They’re very standard in some parts of the world, like Scandinavia. Unions are built on the notion that if one person can bargain, two people can bargain together. They are entitled to that much, not to have their…

What needs to be reiterated constantly, in the current environment, is that unionization is built on the same ground as personal negotiation; the right for a company and a person to negotiate wages, benefits, et cetera, is the same right that allows for two people to negotiate together. Companies already have de facto…

That’s where you’re wrong.

I’m not concerned because I don’t think Black Panther is that great a movie. I’ve said either here or elsewhere: it made waves but had no depth. I like depth, even if the surface isn’t that interesting. Black Panther was great at building a world, and I love that as a gamer, but that’s no excuse for a lack of content…

I said “on par”; I didn’t say they should be compared. That would be unfair. You can have plenty of films across genres with different aims still be on par with other films. A great comedy from 1920 won’t compare well to Good Will Hunting, but I could walk into any university-level class about cinematography and pull…