She probably thought of it. What’s her platform though?

Same as yours. The one where her platform is “No We Can’t” and won’t fight for single payer / government run healthcare. I’m curious as to why you’d rather have insurance companies over that, or why you support fracking, a lack of a carbon tax, and other things kept off the platform. Because you did have a chance to…

There is, but if you’re supportive of a “first past the post” sort of system, that’s pretty telling. Seems like it fits your “I got mine, you didn’t get yours, I win” mentality. Let me know what that does for your healthcare.

Lost the nomination by securing 45% of the vote to his 55% in this scenario. I feel like the emotional value of those numbers isn’t sinking in.

Oh, that’s right. The whole thing about no party unity, now it’s all about party unity. I’m ashamed I forgot that about her history. I should remember that.

No, just 45% of the people who participated. If the tables were flipped, I doubt you’d feel the same way.

As a cisgender, heterosexual, White male in his mid 20s, who comes from a stable, true middle class upbringing, and has lived in places like Sweden and Russia (seeing the highs and lows of Western society), I have to say that I wish people chose Sanders. His proposals were the best for everyone, rich and poor alike.…

Air conditioners are worse for the environment. Why would you use one?

How dare she ever consider bending on, what? Issues like education, healthcare, and the environment? Why would that be bad, because your favorite chosen personality doesn’t “win”?

I think more people are tired of treating this like a reality TV show, where you pick your favorite personality and hope they “win”.

Kotaku’s become an echo chamber whenever certain articles are published. You can expect the same comments over and over - probably due to the voting system. Simple as that, really.

Night Dive Studios also posted on Facebook: “There is a VERY good chance you’ll be seeing Nocturne return from the depths...though you’ll have to be patient.” Looking forward to what they might be doing with that, since that was one of the best survival horror games but was relatively unknown, even at the time.

Right but, what’s it railing against? Doesn’t seem to have any direction.

How is it a terrible assumption? She’s a woman. Are you saying Britain should have waited for the right woman?

One assumes you hold Margaret Thatcher in high regard, correct?

That’s a weird reason not to support a public official.

Seems like if the doc gave that answer, it’d be satisfying what you wanted to hear, not what the writer needed to hear.

LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I’VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE READING YOUR LAST COMMENT.

He’s notorious for his pants-on-head stupid opinions. Don’t hurt your head against that brick wall.

a) they’re saying it in a derogatory way.