Piccles
Piccles
Piccles

Haha fair enough! If it really is all pictures/video though, I wonder if it would make more sense to not spend $400 on the 128gb iPhone, and instead spend $200 on the 16gb, and the other $200 on an actual camera? I'm not sure what kind of quality you can get in that price range, but something to consider if you're

I think it's because they know 16 is too small. Some people will pay for the 128, but Mr. Average Joe doesn't want to spent $400 on the 128. If it was 32/64/128, a lot of people would probably figure the 32 would be good enough and not spend the extra $100 for the 64. But very few people will be content with 16, so by

Oh I definitely agree, theoretically I could fit on a 16gb if I got rid of just a little music, but I wouldn't want to because then if I wanted a new game or something it would be a huge issue. I think I'd be happy with another 32, and I could see some people needing a 64, it's just the 128 that feels ridiculously big

A year after a gadget is released, it will be obsolete and a new, better version will come out? Awesome!

I still kind of agree with the people who disagreed with you, I don't even know how to fill up my 32gb phone. If I took a bit of my music off I could fit on a 16gb phone. Obviously more space is better though, so it's nice that the option exists. The price is ridiculous though, $400 for a phone on contract, or $500

They may now be skipping 32 so you go right from 16 to 64, but that doesn't change that $100 for each size increase is a complete rip-off. I agree that people should get the 64gb, 16 will be too small for a lot of people, but you shouldn't have to pay an extra $100 for it.

You don't have to go to the app, when you tap to pay Android automatically routes the NFC to the correct app. You only have to put in your PIN if the wallet app is currently locked, which you can adjust in the settings to 15 minutes, 1 day, or never. If you have it set to never lock, you would never have to enter your

OLED is the one that can light up individual pixels right? That's definitely what smartwatches need. When not being actively used for "smart" things and just being a watch, a black background would mean IMMENSE battery savings with a screen like that. Plus that would be better for the clock while it's charging on your

Yeah that's what some other people have said. And it actually sounds like that's where the ambient light sensor is (since there's obviously no room for it in the actual bezel around the edge) so I'm okay with it being there now, because I really like how slim t he bezel is and I like that it has an ambient light

What I'm most worried about is proprietaryness. (although that's probably not a word...)

I am one of the people who's major complaint about Apple is their lack of change. Change is good and important with technology. I see your point, you liked the original Moto X, and you're welcome to keep yours if that's what you like, you do not have to buy the new Moto X. Overall, I actually someone agree that phones

I actually thing smartwatches are an important step here. They are still a geeky wearable, that some people think look lame, but don't have nearly the sigma as having something on your face, plus a much lower price point. And we're starting to have some truly nice looking ones, like the Moto 360 (which I'll probably

please see the blog post/video by Maddox from The Best Page in the Universe on this topic

Clearly you've never bothered learning manners. But then again, this is the internet, so I don't know what I was expecting

Oh I see, so it's not really a circular screen, that section is basically bezel but designed so that it doesn't look like bezel. That makes sense, a little annoying but it makes sense.

Maybe this will fix the stupid dead space at the bottom of the Moto 360? I've seen a lot of articles mentioning how much people dislike that, but I've never seen a reason for it's existence. Does anyone know why that small space isn't being used on the bottom of the screen?

Sure, it's in my original post :) I use Ally Bank, which was recommended to me in Mint, a great tool for tracking your finances that Lifehacker has talked about plenty of times. Their savings account currently gets 0.87% interest, which is crazy high these days. Their checking account get's 0.10% interest, which isn't

Yeah, honestly I think it's probably good for parents to share that information with their kids anyways. I happen to have a knack for numbers (majored in Math and Economics) but if math wasn't my thing, then when I got out of college I would have been not even remotely prepared for handling my own finances. I think

Those fees are only unavoidable if you stay with your current bank. There are plenty of banks that do not require any minimum balance, and plenty of banks that do not charge you for using any ATMs. There are some banks, including mine, though this is much rarer, that will even reimburse you for the fee that the other

Or, if you're me, you have zero control over this because my parents think it's "none of my business" how much money they make, so they did the FAFSA themselves and I never even saw it. My mother does not believe me that most of my friends had to do their own FAFSA, she assumes all parents do it so as to avoid telling