It looks a bit of a mess in that video, but that might be more down to the guy using it not knowing how to use it yet.

This article might as well be telling me that Call of Duty: Ghosts is a jibbersnacky on the Xbox One and a muffdangler on the PS4. These numbers mean nothing to me, and having seen the video that supposedly demonstrates how Battlefield 4 looks better on PS4, I didn't notice any real difference, so I honestly couldn't…

This post is doubly ridiculous on account of a) he was obviously just making a joke, and b) COD is going to obliterate Titanfall.

That's an ace deal providing you want three of the games and can be bothered to deal with the schlep of being in a store on release day.

Whoever parked their car here is going to be devastated when they get back from the store.

You'd think Microsoft would be trying to avoid pointing out how freakishly big the Xbox One is, wouldn't you?

Where it says "Killzone Shadow Fall is close to 40GB" does that mean for the digital download or the game install? I assume it's the download. By assume I mean hope.

Remote Play is something I would only ever use outside of my house to be honest. Inside my house I kinda don't need it because my console is in my house. So if it doesn't really work when I'm, say, at my friends house or visiting my parents, then it's not something I'm ever likely to use.

Basically, most things to do with being online are behind a paywall with Gold. As in, you want to watch Netflix, you need Gold. YouTube, Gold.

Without the Instant Game Collection I'd probably be pretty narked that I couldn't play online multiplayer without paying more. But with the Instant Game Collection it's a no brainer. They could double the price of Plus and it would still be worth it for the IGC. Because of that on PS3/Vita, I got games like…

It depends how you define weak really. With COD, Battlefield, FIFA and Assassin's Creed there's four massive games. The flipside is that if you've already got a 360/PS3 then you can play them without buying the PS4.

That's more of a commentary on the sales of the Wii U than it is of the Wii. The fact is, I just think that for all the Wii consoles bought, I'd wager that the fraction of them that were used anywhere near as much as 360s or PS3s would be utterly insignificant.

It's one of the main reasons as to why sales figures can be entirely misleading. Look at sales only for this generation and the Wii smashed it. But I bet I got over a hundred times more use out of my PS3 than my Wii. My Wii hasn't been turned on in two years. If I wasn't such a devoted cleaner it would be caked in…

I've seen a Wii U in the GAME at the the Metrocentre. I played on New Super Mario Bros. U for about ten minutes. It's the only one I've ever seen in the wild.

If that growth in the gaming population hasn't stayed part of the gaming population then that is the very definition of a fad.

Surely the latter. It's already pretty much forgotten about.

I've never actually seen an advertisement for it over here. The marketing for the system has been atrocious.

I can well believe it. Over here in England some big supermarkets like ASDA stopped stocking the Wii U because it was selling too few to justify the shelf space. I don't know a single person that owns one. In fact, most people I've heard talk about it either a) didn't know it was a thing, or b) thought it was an…

The only thing I really don't like about the PS3 controller is the triggers curve the wrong way. They're made of butter and you have to press them at the top rather than the centre to make sure your finger doesn't slip off.

I'm willing to be proved tremendously wrong in this, but honestly, I think Microsoft might be betting on the wrong horse, and Titanfall isn't going to be that big of a deal.