Because it presumes that there are, in fact, women voting for Clinton because she has a vagina, based on sexist tropes that women are stupid, flighty, shallow, and irrational. The reality is that many women believe that Clinton is the best candidate on women’s issues— because she’s a woman.

I have yet to see any Clinton supporters state that they intend to vote their vagina. This is not actually a thing and I wish that people would stop claiming that it is to dismiss our opinions. It’s extremely sexist. Even women who say that they want to vote for her because she’s a woman aren’t supporting her because…

Sigh. Why would people vote for women because they are women, without even reviewing their stances on women’s right?

Can’t we have a single conversation about Hillary’s ability to serve without her uterus wandering into it?

That way it stays secure and the “Master Key” as you called it, never ends up in the hands of anyone other than Apple and it’s not just at the governments disposal.

So you don’t do any online shopping, online banking, eBay management, bitcoin management, or entering of passwords on your phone?

No, it is technically impossible because the only way to do this to a single phone without putting other phones at risk is to install new software on the phone, which you can only do while it is unlocked.

I find it interesting that this article does NOT touch on the fact that this is not a personal phone, but a government owned one, and the government agency has given permission for them to open it.

How about we change it just a little more and include health conditions that aren’t immediately life-threatening, which are also technically not banned but are still excluded? There’s a lot of them and I am of the opinion that, for instance, a very small uncleared miscarriage’s “life” is less important than the health…

It’s fairly good fan-based propaganda, actually, employing internet harassment techniques combined with far right paranoia-induction techniques. And it results in well-meaning people posting false information, including this article.

Except for the part where this is omits that the undecided superdelegates from the state exist and are undecided, as well as assuming that none of the superdelegates committed to Clinton switch away from Clinton like they did in 2008.

Well, in their defense, women aren’t people and therefore we don’t have a right to life. Fetuses only have a “right to life” because they might turn out male.

Nice straw man. That’s not implied. You inferred it because you hate Jezebel, right?

Yesterday, I saw a young, female Sanders supporter called Clinton a “whore” for taking money for her work, implying that she was unqualified for it despite being one of the most qualified people in the world for it, saying that it didn’t matter that she was being faulted for being paid the same as a man. Then she said…

I doubt he likes Adele. That would be admitting that an empowered woman has value. I think he picked Adele for a song because she’s extremely popular.

Oh, well, of course the woman must by lying. I mean, debates are about logic and not rhetoric, their reputation to the contrary.

Yes, let's freak out every time someone uses a non-gender-specific insult because women don't like it when gendered insults are used against us for behaving in ways that are celebrated in men.

You’re not aware of much.

Why you think that we’re idiots. That, specifically, is what I want to know.

I’m not sure why you think that we’re interested in your opinion on this matter. Sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling “NUH UH” may make your little friends pat you on the back but the rest of us aren’t gullible. But thanks for the condescension and implication that women are too stupid to add 1 + 1!