Let's just assume for the sake of argument that Lindy is shoehorning this into her "pet topic:" why is she disallowed to discuss discrimination against her when it is included in a topic?

Right, tone policing as "shut up" and that means that you agree. Whatthefuckever.

So what you're saying is that she is factually correct in that she is reacting to what other articles did, but you are still "correct" that by doing so, she is shoehorning in the issue that they literally talked about in those articles, which she shouldn't do.

What exactly is supposedly "open for discussion" here? An author's ability to pick a topic of her choice? She has that ability. You don't get a say in that.

Non-racist southerners (such as myself) realize that "Southern heritage" = white racist heritage and that's why we've been complaining about the Confederate flag for decades. You're right that not all Southerners are racists and not all racists are Southerners, but all Southerners who go one about "Southern heritage"…

Uh huh. Right.

The vast majority of meth for sale in the US is made in Mexico. They import the ingredients from Asia in bulk. Sudafed isn't being used to make meth and there is no substitute medication; the best equivalent is worse than placebo. I'm tired of allergy sufferers being thrown under the bus by morons who don't even know…

Yes, somewhere, there's an excuse for rape threats. When you find it, let us know.

It's funny because rape porn is illegal in the US so you are claiming that she is deserves to be raped because she's in porn that you've watched yet somehow can't describe properly despite offering graphic details. The porn that she's in is legal. You're just lying to attack her for starring in something that you…

Bro may be douchier than depicted.

Actually, there was a statistical study. For every 100 women online who got death threats, 2.7 men got them. That seems kinda gender specific to me.

Look, we all know that you don't actually want an answer, that you believe that you found a "gotcha" that will allow you to continue blaming rape victims and feeling awesome about it. That's why I'll answer your moronic question.

Yes, you believe that a man owns the body of his pregnant exgirlfriend, that she should be required to put the rest of her life on hold in case he changes his mind and wants the child that he asked her to abort, and that she shouldn't go to her free ride at an Ivy league school that is also offering her child care…

Because he doesn't do it in California.

But apparently, a free ride to Columbia is equivalent enough to "nearest college to Bode Miller's house" that it doesn't matter that it's Columbia because it's not a DOCTORAL program. Whatthefuckever.

The reason is that the judges have made decisions based on sexism that oh by the way, have been overturned.

Yes, you are going to get massacred here because you're omitting information that's important to your argument because it doesn't support your argument and also, you're being a hypocritical asshole.

LaVey said that he based Satanism largely on the objectivist ideology of Ayn Rand. It's religious libertarianism.

So?

Then you are undoubtedly familiar with the false appeal to authority, despite routinely making it.