Actually, that's exactly what normal people do. If you had friends, you would too.

Last night one of my friends posted an article about how poorly Richard Sherman was portrayed in the media for behaving in a way that white men frequently behave. (He was portrayed as an angry black man, with people talking about how terrifying he was for reacting with excited hubris when he made a game-winning,…

Oh hey! I just went through your comment history and found some really interesting articles that you posted attempted MRA "gotchas" like this one. Thanks for the handy reading guide!

It was good of him to take one for the team and step away from the pubmed for a bit.

The one who asks if the other would like a penis for her vagina is the boy and the one who gets asked that is the girl.

Of course. How could we be so stupid? The problem here, like the problem with the Stubenville rapists, isn't the non-consensual sexual behavior directed towards a woman over whom the guy has a bit of power; the problem is that he allowed it to be documented online.

Keep on keeping on, Greg. Despite her claim, her intent wasn't clearly non-racist. If she doesn't want to be held accountable for her words, she should keep them to herself. And I always love the "thanks in advance for following my fucking orders" remarks when the thing demanded is to remove text that she posted to…

Oh honey, no. Purses are where the tampons and ATM receipts go. Now get back in the kitchen; I could use a sandwich.

To quote my friend Bill: you can't spell artisanal without anal.

Interesting. I'm white and I have admitted that I don't like Beyonce on the Beyonce threads there and no one even complained. There's a difference between saying that Beyonce isn't to my tastes and saying that Beyonce is a terrible artist that no one should listen to.

Perhaps you should have stayed to see if that commenter got called out for that bad behavior, especially considering the number of mixed race women post there. But no, this one time someone said something mean to you and you immediately left because the whole forum is terrible.

You confirmed your bias and found out that it was wrong when you reread it. Shocker.

However, when people have posted criticism of your work, you've banned them from the main page. You're notorious for dismissing comments that call out problematic things in your work, and we can still see the comments to verify that they were mild. And now people are using lack of complaints on your posts as "proof"…

You should just become a regular Groupthink reader. You would learn a lot.

Funny because anyone calling someone mentally ill for disagreeing on GT would be called out by the commentariat as ableist. So basically, you're a liar.

No, that was the follow up "joke" to "explain" the previous, appalling joke. Way to show how informed you are about the topic on which you're calling people names.

I think you're confused in general.

Ahh and here is why you change accounts so frequently. You just contradicted your previous post. First you had daughters, now you may in the future. You can't even keep your lies straight across two posts. Do you have a wife yet or did you make her up too?

I just said I made a burner because I had better things to do than build an online presence on some site

You either need glasses or an exam by a neurologist, perhaps both.