I miss the weekly feature y’all used to do with the Sunday viewing maps. It was fun to try to puzzle out the rationale.

No, five people whose testimony should be admitted to rehabilitate the victim after the defense attempts to impeach her credibility.

You don’t have anything to worry about, Burger King already has cameras.

Absolutely, and if any of these men are ever actually charged with a crime, they will be afforded the same due process as all other defendants. Or did you mean public opinion? No, there’s no due process for that.

I almost hit that star when I saw you correct the error about Verlander starting game 1, glad I held off until I got to the second paragraph.

How has he not yet been deemed a vexatious litigant?

Here’s the thing that a shocking number of bros can’t seem to understand, and it’s like, the most fundamental rule of comedy: edgy and offensive is generally fine if you’re punching up, it’s never ok if you’re punching down. I know that limits the jokes that can be made by cis white dudes, but consider it literally…

Barstool is dumb and unfunny, but IMO it would be just another dumb and unfunny website (like The Chive and BroBible) if it weren’t for the fact that its fanbase is an atrocity. “Stoolies” are worse than cult-members when it comes to blindly, unreservedly, and violently defending their Dear Leaders. They append…

Because the chances of the perpetrator facing any consequences are extremely low, and the chances of the victim facing negative consequences (victim shaming, a reputation for being a drama queen or a liar, death/rape threats from the perpetrator’s “fans,” etc) are extremely high.

I love horror movies. The two that stuck with me the most (as in, when I’m alone in the dark and my brain wants to punish me, these are the movies I think about):

Thank you for googling “barstool nude infants” because I really, really did not want to.

I know y’all forgot to post about Dallas Keuchel owning the Yanks last night, but it’s still Game 2.

McHale wouldn’t do that because he’s arguing in bad faith. Shortly after McHale was fired, his wife went on Twitter and made it perfectly clear that McHale hates Harden and blames Harden for losing his job. So all that “woo gotta be able to take constructive criticism” hand waving is a bunch of bullshit. McHale is…

The group of misfits and has-beens that were predicted to go 41-41 last season that Harden dragged to 55 wins and the 3-seed in the West seemed to think so.

It was completely overlooked by the national media at the time, but shortly after the Rockets fired McHale, his wife went on her Twitter account and said a bunch of ugly stuff about Harden, like that he wanted McHale fired because he’s too lazy to play defense. She deleted her account pretty quick after that. It was…

Title fights do not allow the extra pound.*

Dale Hansen is an American treasure and Dallas’ only redeeming quality.

This whole thing is hilariously ironic because Neshek has ZERO tolerance for being bothered - he is notorious for blocking everyone on Twitter, like the Ben Roethlisberger of MLB.

I agree with all of this, except I don’t think it’s fair to assume that most of the people misinterpreting the tweet were doing so willfully. I’m assuming you are referring to the “let the facts speak for themselves” tweet, which I read the way he intended it, probably because I showed up a little late to the car…

Ugh, don’t give Goodell any ideas.