OniExpress
OniExpress
OniExpress

I'm going to be as polite as possible with this, but no, you can't. You physically, biologically cannot retain a memory 100% over this period of time. It's not how the chemistry works, and it's not how the psyche works. The thing is that, in general, people will believe that they remember an event with perfect

I suppose it's theoretically possible that the digital information could be outsourced for processing, but (a) this is people's genetic information that could theoretically be leaked to who-knows-who (also, prior to a conviction. ALSO, even convicts retain their right to privacy in this regard), (b) there isn't much

I agree that a hold should be put on the statute of limitations while evidence is being actively processed; it's akin to a defendant dragging out court procedures long enough to run out the clock. I also think that DNA evidence should be kept permanently on file (though without standard DNA testing on all arrests,

How clearly do you think you can remember an event from 10 years ago? 20 years? 30? Because the fact of the matter is that regardless of how clearly we think that we remember events, that's not how the human mind works. A testimony taken 30 years after the fact is only reliable for the most general of facts, and

Probably not, at least the way (I think) you are intending. There would be a lot of issues with neutrality, not to mention all of the regulations involving unprocessed evidence. Look at it this way: there's been a lot of issues over the past year involving tampering by officials (in both ways) that has caused

Proofreading... how does it work? ;)

As someone who works in IT, you can go through a crazy amount of bandwidth while on the job. I think the highest I've ever seen on mine was 18gb within a 30-day period.

You're correct. I'm also noticing an upsurge in South Africans. I seem to bump into one everywhere nowadays.

This was also the "underworld" equivalent of killing every individual with middle-eastern blood or blowing up the United Nations, destabilizing the entire world and throwing it into chaos (an opportunity that's not missed by the WORSE enemies). Considering that many of the individuals killed were older than most

I don't believe it has inspection or oversight, but I do know that there is a significant amount of trust from the populace. You'd need to look into it yourself; I can't say that I really care, to he honest. Heh.

As mentioned above, there are publications/websites that keep track of stuff that's kosher when not kosher-certified.

Yup... that'd be him.

Just... why did you even go there? I could hear your sigh from here; it was the sound of one who wishes they were dead (while knowing that they truly are on the inside). Please don't do that anymore, we're begging you.

Please stay in the Grey Wastes.

It has no bearing on a possible wrongful dismissal suit, or if he has it in a contract that this was agreed on, but it certainly does make a difference in a religious discrimination suit. Unless an employer gives some religions this ability, they are under no obligation to give anyone time off for religious reasons.

...What does that have to do with his comment above?

I couldn't actually tell you if I saw all three movies in theaters. Binge-watching the extended versions has made much more of an impression on me; I'm sure that I saw them all in theaters, but I can't actually remember it.

If I was able to post GIFs (let alone out of The Greys), I would be posting a High-And-Dancing-Vampires-From-True-Blood impage right now.

To be fair, I would imagine that a lot of this has to do with the general downsizing of police forces (specifically here in London). Keeping a very close eye on Facebook usage from work is a good way to get rid of people without paying severance packages/etc. As a general rule I have no great love for cops (though,

I believe the term is "cocksmith".