Exactly. Doing this would get me fired.

We have a choice: you're a troll account or a desperately crazy person. I choose to live in a world where someone thinks this is funny, as opposed to one where pants-on-head-crazy people wander the countryside.

Wow, this is an elaborate troll account.

This is one of those shows that I've been looking to re-watch for years, I've just never found it. I'd also really like to watch a few episodes of Finders Keepers, which most people I've talked to don't even remember having existed.

Yes, that's exactly the same thing.

It's the same as the difference in people (profiles, for another term) that steal: you have people who grab something off a shelf in a store, you have people who will grab someone's purse or wallet while unattended, you have people who will directly rob someone, you have people who will break into an…

It's your option, of course, but if there's significant reason to think that you're XXY you should probably get it verified. There's a range of issues associated with Klinefelter's Syndrome (for others reading, basically XXY genetics, which in the briefest term increases the likelyhood that the individual will…

I think that calling it "offensive" might be going a little too far. Maybe borderline, but it's one of those questions that you're not necessarily going to have given to you until after you've made a mistake.

Of course I know that, which is why I know that the only realistic change between the two periods was that people were paid less in currency that went a bit more. Basically, exactly the same as now for all intents and purposes. Certainly not "worked less", and a similar percentage of people worked more jobs/more…

You can do that already. It's called a "take away" in these parts. You just have to choose your restaurant wisely.

Buuuuuuuuullllllllshiiiiiaaaaat people worked less 40 years ago. Accountants worked less 40 years ago, some jobs might have worked less 40 years ago, but people as a group did not.

That's the problem. What you're asking for is literally not possible without preservatives OR a 20-minute wait.

Sorry, I always happen to fault people who decide to go to a glorified Debate Team instead of people who have any pull in the real world whatsoever. Deliberately going to a school administrator instead of a lawyer is stupid.

I'm not saying he's any great mind. Odds are that he isn't. But when a day later this goes to Jez and (ironically) turns into commentary on a 14 year old girl losing her virginity...? Come on, you gotta think that's a little weird.

So this is going to be the stance in this article's version? "He objected for over two minutes so he should be arrested and shit said about his 14 year old daughter"?

I was with your final point back in the Non-Jezified version of this article. But no, it's certainly not the kind of book that you can say "oops, we forgot to send out the memo to parents".

Historically, my old desktop PCs have been re-purposed to other uses. My current PC is a 5-ish year old AMD 3+ six-core with 8gb of ram that was good for the time (high performance) but is rather low speed by current standards. It has no PCI 3, no USB 3, and no SATA 6gb/s. Realistically it's days as a primary…

It's nothing terribly new; I've seen this happen rarely over the years when a big movie with an intent marketing team wants to get that extra notice. It's more odd that you'd hav e atrailer for a linked-but-not-linked movie at the end, where traditionally (in these days, for this type of movie) you would get some…

I'm actually wondering myself: consider me stupid, but I really don't know what that phrase is supposed to mean in this case. I presume it's supposed to be a euphemism for a much more graphic set of words, but I really just have a hard time finding a plausible explanation with the information that I have at hand.

Good question. With two states having legalized it, is there any standard yet for content in processed product?