OnMyMindGrapes
OnMyMindGrapes
OnMyMindGrapes

I enjoy being moved. Whether intellectually or emotionally, I read to go somewhere else, to find out what to do, and to connect to a larger zeitgeist.

I'd also like to see more posts about books. io9 does a great one every month with new SFF books. I'd like to see one on Jez every month that are themed i.e. Female authors (or whatever). A lot of us read and read a lot. It would be nice to have less Kardashian and more, well, anything really.

I'd love to see at least 1 Ask an Expert every month. And not a sex expert or a sex worker or a sex anything, but science, medicine, the arts, engineering, space, all of that stuff. There's so little of that on Jezebel and I think it could be very helpful.

I love that he wastes so much time with tough-guy posturing, too. He makes sure we know he'll kick an ass if it touches one of his female possessions, though said possession could save him the trouble by rethinking her tone before it gets that far.

People who want "A-list" treatment shouldn't be flying Southwest.

Wait, now Jenny McCarthy's kid is autistic again? He is the only kid with the seasonal autism in the world. SMH.

The fact that people can invade countries or handwave abuse is evidence of power and influence. That doesn't mean they're justified in doing it; it only means that they can. Hitler and Stalin were highly influential people but no one is singing their praises. Funding a homeless shelter doesn't make her even one of the

Time Magazine, like every other player in the flailing and failing print industry, puts the person most likely to sell magazines on the cover of the "most influential" issue. If anyone honestly believes that Beyonce is more influential in the global sphere than, I don't know, actual world leaders, I would recommend

You do realize I am sitting at my desk at work literally laughing out loud hysterically at that, which is what my post is referencing here?

The most

And I can already smell the barrage of think pieces from pop culture critics trying to dissect a marriage they were never a part of.

But having said all that, I think it's important to recognize that that doesn't mean [you] have a right to [people being] comfortable with you.

And only distractions related to DUIs, drug charges, dog fighting/killing, vehicular manslaughter, punching your wife out in an elevator, etc. Those kind of distractions....A-OK. Kissing a dude? GTFO.

All of this is garbage. All of it.

Posted below, but applies to you, too: If your "opinion" is that certain people should be discriminated against, then you're a bigot. You're allowed to be a bigot if you want, but this isn't name-calling. It's the definition of the word.

...why are we focusing on lingerie night and not on the fact that some guy thought that it would be okay to try to kidnap a woman? If anyone is the problem, it's him."

The guy might have shot her anyway. It is absurd to try to view this as a rational transaction, or to try to apply some "people are more important than property" standard.

1.) No one should ever have to "give in" to an aggressive, violent assailant to avoid being told they should have given in to an aggressive, violent assailant. We all have the right to stand up for and defend ourselves, regardless of whether that defense is over a phone or something more personal (and less easily

The tone of this article does not sit well with me at all. Victim blaming BS that is used against women all the god damn time.