Ogre8
Ogre8
Ogre8

With all the mistakes that the NFL has made trying to take the fun out of the game, and all the meddling that MLB is doing now because apparently people don’t have the attention span to watch a baseball game anymore, this is the cherry on top. This sport has been so mismanaged it’s laughable. I want to see artificial

Sure, but at present the land based leg of our triad only carries one warhead per vehicle. Which is our only ICBM right now. Trident, as you very accurately pointed out, is an SLBM.

This actually looks and sounds pretty good. My problem is I’m leery of FCA build quality and frankly a little concerned about the company’s future in general.

I remember midgetman and the m-x program. Who knows, maybe Trump is trying to get Putin to bankrupt Russia like Reagan did with Star Wars.

I imagine that in post war Europe styling didn’t matter much.

I can absolutely get behind improvements in command and control as well as hardening our overall military communication system. And if we’re committed to one warhead per icbm perhaps a smaller newer missile would be easier to maintain in the long run. But you’d have to be crazy to think we need more warheads just for

The Maxima is a great midsize sedan for that price range. I don’t know why they don’t promote it more. I’m not really a Nissan guy but I’d drive that. If I could fit anyway, it’s short on headroom for me personally.

Why does anyone act surprised by this? It’s China. It’s a single party oligarchy with no freedom of anything. You know, like some people want the USA to be.

My wife pouts if I get anything other than ragu traditional, so I’ll take all the advice on this topic I can get.

Some good responses here. I’ll just add get it up on a rack and start looking/turning/wheels off etc. An alignment rack is a good choice for this.

Needs a grille. I realize that’s a large expense to design and manufacture but if they really are gunning for trail hawks it needs to look a little more aggressive.

Looks like souls aren’t the only thing being bared.

Hope he was kidding about the teeth.

It’s becoming a common viewpoint among younger people I think. They weren’t raised by the WW2 generation like I was. Those people were sure Japan would never have surrendered without the bomb and would have been invaded both by the US, Australia and Britain but the soviets too. Untold millions would have died and

No one, or at least no one who has seriously thought about the war in Europe, discounts the soviet sacrifice and contributions to victory. I think everyone agrees it would have been unlikely without American supplies.

To have another shot at the $2k 1970 Challenger 440 my dad was smart enough to not let me have in 1980.

Thanks everyone for all the responses. Also I assume “white goods” is something sort of generic or low cost?

1st gear: European Jalops, are Opel and vauxhall looked at as quality, interesting cars over there? Is this a market GM needs for a global brand strategy?

Interesting. Thanks for the info.

I also get that, and the point for the navy was that these were navy men who rose to be commander in chief. Notable sailors get destroyers named for them. Reagan was definitely because president, I agree, but having been around back then and remembering what the military’s morale was coming out of Vietnam I get that