And as an agent of the state she is violating seperation of church and state.

Irrelevant fetuses aren’t babies; babies survive out side of another person’s body with no need to leech off of the person via their umbilical cord. Your entire premise for this statement is invalid because you ignored the crux of my argument; also I never said anything about sentience or sapience as a standard for…

And you don’t value the equal protection clause of the constitution. You hilariously state in one sentence that Kim Davis’s beliefs should not be put to an outsiders litmus test; but when I confronted you with he exact same situation on an issue you didn’t like all of a sudden litmus test by outsiders are an essential…

Her name is on a lot of papers why has she not taken her name of of every one that is considered a violation of her religious beliefs.

Kim Davis is an elected official; not an employee. She’s no more of an employee of the state than the governor or the president.

Once again you show yourself incapable of answering a simple yes or no question. It is a clear cut example just like your slavery example. Would you support me in violating the law, just like Kim Davis, is in providing abortions on demand in support of my religious freedom?

If it need another individuals body to survive it is a paracite not a “person” also scientists would agree with me. Why do you hate my religious freedom?

So does this mean you stand by my Satanic Abortionist who wants a religious exemption so they can give out abortions on demand?

Only if you ignore what the form actually says. Hilarious how you can’t answer a simple yes or no question. You are not defending Rosa Parks here; you are defending George Wallace standing at the door of the schoolhouse; you are defending “separate but equal” which is never equal, you are defending for Kim Davis to…

YOu do know she files and records the divorce papers the same way she files and records the marriage certificates, right? She has to sign and date when and where the divorce took place. Also you should do some research on Apostolic Christian Church it subscribes to biblical liberalism so her signing her name on…

So your answer is my religious freedom doesn’t matter because “reasons” and “you say so?” One of the cornerstones of Satanism is “responsibility to the responsible” as part of that the belief that if you can’t afford to pay for you children then you shouldn’t have them is a sacred tradition. Another Satanic belief is…

We’re not talking about the merits of abortion, or when life begins; just like your ananlogy wasn’t about the merits of slavery; it’s about my religious freedom and my righ to object to laws that force me to act in manner contrary to my beliefs. So any personhood arguments you have are irrelevant to this conversation.…

Funny how you insist on not answering the question I posed to you or maybe you skipped over that bit; so I’ll pose it again.

What you really mean; “I have no rational argument against what you have said so I am going to resort to ad hominem attacks and I am going to refuse to actually address anything you have actually said because at the end of the day FAGGOTS SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO MARRY BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS SO BURN IN HELL BURN IN…

I already covered that bu I guess I’ll have to repeat myslef yet again because of your lack of reading comprehension or selctive argumentation. BY KIM DAVIS REMAINING IN HER JOB SHE PROVES HERSELF A COWARD THAT SHE HAS NO FAITH IN HER CONVICITION OR IN THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS TO CHANGE HE CONSTITTUTION TO ALLOW HER TO…

Amazing how you conveniently omit vast swaths of what I have said in order to attempt to manipulate the conversation. Either you’re obtuse or in desperate need of reading comprehension. I will say this again as clearly as I can and as bluntly; if my elected position suddenly became a slave certification as part of it…

No one is telling her to shut up; she has every right to petition the government to change the constitution to change the equal protection clause to allow for discrimination against gay people. If I stayed in my slave certifying job I am doing nothing but perpetuating the system; I’m not a hero I’m a coward who…

I believe my respnonse spoke for itself; but I’ll say it again; just to answer the stupid premise of you irrational argument; if I’m in an elected position that neither entails writing laws nor interpreting the constitution, and through those mechanisms the laws change and my responsibilities become morally…

Still the marriage liscense doesn’t say that either; the officiant and the witnesses are the ones that do that; not the county clerk; the county clerks job is to hand them out and record them when they return.

But just to answer the stupid premise of you irrational argument; if I’m in an elected position that neither…

Well since the marriage licensee doesn’t say “I Kim Davis approve of this marriage.” or “I Kim Davis hereby grant a license to marry before God” then there’s nothing to change and if she doesn’t like it she can go work for a church where they can freely refuse to serve gay all they want.