Its all shipped by boat, not by air.

I would reason that it was internal theft, based on my knowledge of Wal-Mart policy. I work for the Wal-Mart corporation, albeit not at Wal-Mart, and they pay their employees rather well, have decent benefits, and stock options from day one. I love my job at Sam's club. I really wish you wouldn't fucking judge like…

What I hate most about the share everything plan is that it wouldn't save me money. I have four lines. One smart phone, three dumb phones, and it would cost me more than it does now for unlimited data. So, they want more out of me, in my case, and I think its crap.

Clearly he meant Dieter Ram? Not Dieter Braun. Braun was a race car driver, while Dieter Ram worked for the Braun Company.

Its not too difficult to get a tank, and getting fully auto milsurp machine guns is fairly simple albeit time consuming and expensive. But I fail to see why our ownership of tanks and fully automatic weapons is a problem? There's nothing wrong with the individual right to own anything they wish.

Brent, thanks fore not being just a bystander, you're a real hero, and every American has something to learn from your lack of cowardice. Cheers, and have a speedy recovery.

Its because people seem to think that the Constitution is a "living document", and it isn't. Its interesting to note how it only becomes open to interpretation when someone needs a different interpretation. Its the same with xtians and the bible. They'll just say whatever suits them the best.

I like your sarcasm, at least, I hope it's sarcasm.

You keep looking at this issue through some very Neocapitalist goggles and you're missing the point entirely. It's not about corporate law or contract law. People are upset that they're getting fucked up the ass all in the name of cold profit. There was no reason togetrid of unlimited data to begin with,and to top…

I thought he had a pretty good response. On the other hand, I thought you were just being a dick and a troll. So, there.

Fair enough, and thanks for not attacking me, I realized that my comment may have come off as more angry than I'd originally intended. I won't deny that there's a whole line of headphones pandering to bassheads, but I really, really love the neutrality of my Grados. I don't listen to very bass heavy music, except for…

I happen to support nuclear power and think its a wonderful idea.

They really aren't. Once again, a random Gizmodo commenter fails to understand that some people don't like their music to sound like shit. Soul doesn't stand a beat (pun intended) against Shure or Grado.

I love my Milwaukee, that's the brand I stick with.

After seeing this, and knowing that I had to replace all the ink in my Canon Pixma at a cost of 80 dollars, I decided to say fuck it and buy a Samsung laser printer for 70 bucks. I'm done with paying such high prices. I'm a college students.

I believe, if it's spoken aloud, its actually slander. If it's written, then it is libel.

Or, you could just look up some of Hicks' original works. But seriously, Leary did steal entire acts from Hicks. It's quite sad.

At the bottom it should read "free for Prime subscribers" not "from for". #corrections

I'm not stating in any way, shape, or form, that wind or solar create more waste than coal or oil. My question was simply to ascertain how many new solar farms or turbine farms would have to be constructed to supply the gross power needs of this one facility. This begs the question: is there enough renewable energy…

Someone should explain how Apple could go green? The amount of power to be generated by solar or wind would require many panels or turbines, respectively. This would destroy how much land? Produce how much aggregate waste? Do we even think things through anymore?