NotAgain
NotAgain
NotAgain

That is absolutely the best part of that note.

Now I must know... who is the other one?

Me too! He's way better than any of my real uncles. He seems so genuinely kind and warm. I just love him.

I too have great plans for that gif.

I'm with you on the Ken love and the bewilderment about the casting for young Dick Whitman. The kid looks NOTHING like Don. Even with a potential Neville Longbottom transformation as a possibility, he'd still never look like Jon Hamm. He's not even a particularly good actor.

Advice for actually asking: treat it like you treat any difficult task. Pick a date you're going to do it, and then just force yourself. It sucks. Maybe enlist a trusted friend to hang with you while you ask, or at least call you the day you've decided will be your deadline and and tell you to get your ass in gear.

Two of the sweetest, most chill dogs I've ever known were Dobermans. It sucks that they have a bad rep.

Exactly. I don't mind a little sweaty/dirty/hot action, but greasy I can't handle.

You're being deliberately obtuse. I merely used riding in a car seat as an example of something we do to protect children, no matter how much they dislike it, because we're the grownups and we know better.

All the Khal Drogo hotness leached right out of him and into that stupid hat.

Again, the point is that once you decide to have an animal as a pet, you take responsibility for it, and sometimes that means doing things that might make it MARGINALLY less happy. I think in rare circumstances there are cats that have always been allowed out and might not ever adjust to being indoors only, but most

Every cat I've ever had that lived indoors just fine, and the two cats I've had that went out and got killed by cars.

Cats do not NEED to go out. It's just a total fallacy to say that. Cats can be perfectly happy indoors if they have plenty of room to run and play and they get lots of exercise. And if they don't get let out, they adjust perfectly well to being indoors.

I think it is because it was a preventative mastectomy. My friend who had cancer had to have her entire breast removed, including the nipple.

I have but only because a good friend with breast cancer had the gene for ovarian cancer as well. Before that, I had no idea they were related, and I have plenty of formal education and general knowledge.

Yeah, he's the only consistently funny person on there.

I think it's highly dependent on situation, i.e. if you're getting preventative surgery, as Jolie was, or if you have cancer, and if so, where is that located, etc. My friend who has breast cancer did, indeed, have both breasts removed entirely, and her reconstruction included forming a nipple and tattooing on an

Yeah, I'd be yanking those ovaries right alongside my breasts in that situation. Ovarian cancer is pretty deadly since there's no real screening for it. Reading the article, it sort of sounded like she did plan an oophorectomy, but she was just waiting until all of the mastectomy-related surgeries were done.

Dude, did that really happen? Because that will have to go in my list of reasons to hate the internet, which is rapidly overtaking my reasons to love the internet.

If you have cancer, implants are covered. My guess (and it's purely a guess) is if you have insurance that will cover the preventative mastectomy, it probably covers the reconstructive surgery.