Translation: “Don’t report car news that makes my choices at the poll look foolish”

Holy fucking shit buddy, how many times do we need to go through this: THE CONTEXT IS POLLUTION AND THE COSTS THAT FOLLOW. How many fucking times does it need to be said before this gets into your thick fucking skull?

This all traces back to your initial premise that it is unreasonable for you to be expected to use…

I don’t commute, I drive. Field operations for a large restaurant chain with far-flung locations. Which is why I stated that I literally would not be able to do my job without doing the large amount of miles, there is no choice to be made here, if I’m not the one doing it someone else will be paid to.

The tax doesn’t…

Well in the case of the truck it was a failing of the camera to discern the difference between a bright white truck and a bright sky. Not really a whole lot to “figure out” in that regard, it’s just the visual range of the camera, the answer is more sensors and relying less heavily on just the visual feed(which if I…

You don’t need to figure out something that has a readily available answer

I read it all and I found it to not be compelling or even remotely applicable to the discussion at hand. And you keep hitting on people trying to ban something they don’t do, but I do drive, a LOT. A full stop ban on gas cars(in city or otherwise) would render me unable to do my job, looking at my odometer I fell just…

Again, take this within the context of the article and just look at how bad the smog problem in Paris is.

And I would remind you that the long trip for you into work is your choice, living in the suburbs is your choice and taking a job far from home that requires a commute is your choice. Where do you get off passing…

It is always our responsibility to contribute the least harm to our fellows that we reasonably can.

Your annoyance vs the health and wellbeing of everyone breathing the city air...yeah you lose this round Mike

Heating is energy intensive, I really doubt you would pull positive

Do you find it at all ironic that you use the same argument against this that horse lovers used against cars when they arrived in the market?

Known by its other name “this fucking shitty song people dust off every Christmas”

I’m always astounded by people who manage to hold this position, that racism is somehow endemic to white people. Why sort of mental gymnastics do you need to do to convince yourself that while people are just naturally racist while also believing that your position is not bigoted?

Because the nature of human rights is that we can’t just choose when and where we apply them, and if we open the door to allow the government to take the lives of citizens we would be doing exactly that.

She’s human garbage, that’s who she is and will always be.

Having spent time as a 16-25 year old man I can say without doubt that the most dangerous thing isn’t men, it’s bad ideas

Recycling lithium-based batteries can take lots of forms, it doesn’t just mean that we will be tearing the packs down for raw material. Packs from cars will likely find(its been proposed) a new home as capacity for grid storage. So there is a healthy second life for these packs.

We don’t ignore it, it just doesn’t make…

Because it’s a foolish way to power a car. Nobody is going to look back at hydrogen as a missed opportunity

How is that in any single way relevant? It isn’t the same party pursuing the same goals. The harder you try the dumber you look

When you have the support of the actual fucking without a joke KKK it might be time to ask “what the fuck am I even saying?”