NinjaMarion
NinjaMarion
NinjaMarion

Well yeah. Councilman, reporter, peaceful protester... they don't care. There was a Vine from yesterday of a woman asking the police chief if she, while unarmed and being peaceful, was going to end up gassed again like the day before. Then she mentions that she's one of the state's senators.

Well yeah. Councilman, reporter, peaceful protester... they don't care. There was a Vine from yesterday of a woman asking the police chief if she, while unarmed and being peaceful, was going to end up gassed again like the day before. Then she mentions that she's one of the state's senators.

Yep. The glitches. It was ridiculously glitchy. To the point WB had to make a statement that they weren't gonna do more bugfixes... because they needed to focus on working on DLC for it. THAT'S why people hate it.

No, no, no! The game isn't getting an unfair rap. Yes, it's a fun, entertaining, "good" game. The problem is that it's exactly what the complaints call it: A poorly made cash-grab.

There were no changes. These people built an entire business model on something the EULA has prohibited all along and are now blaming Notch for their skirting the rules.

Because he's a legitimate reviewer who puts in tons of effort and original content in his reviews? I mean, fuck, Siskel and Ebert were allowed to use movie footage for their reviews and there wasn't nearly the effort and original work put into their reviews as Joe's have (considering they sat in a chair and talked

No. Fucking no. Yes, I fully agree that we should have single-payer. And single payer would be infinitely better than the ACA. The problem is that all the anti-ACA, "Obama is a commie antichrist!" republicans will NEVER let that happen. Mitt Romney's solution to being uninsured while running for president was "go to

Haha. Nice try, but no. The only reason there is the fine is because it only works IF everyone gets insurance. It's there entirely to deter idiots from refusing to carry healthcare if they can otherwise afford it. If stupid healthy people figure "I don't need insurance, I'm fine!", then premiums stay high and

No, you wouldn't. The ACA is specifically written to say that you CAN'T be arrested for failure to pay the tax penalty for not carrying healthcare. The most they can do is withhold the penalty amount from your tax return. Not that that's stopped Republicans and generic Obamacare-haters from saying otherwise.

Except it actually has been a tax this whole time. People are just too stupid to notice. Your money CURRENTLY pays for uninsured... at retardedly high prices, as their only option is the emergency room. This covers two points of where you're paying more than with socialized healthcare.

Correct... except for everything you said.. Learn what's in the law before mindlessly bashing it. The wording of the ACA explicitly prohibits jailtime for not paying the penalty. It's probably about the only tax you legally can't be imprisoned for not paying.

Saints Row 4 almost did that. Troy Baker was the default male voice and Nolan North was the Nolan North male voice. No Cam Clarke, though it does have Yuri Lowenthal.

No, not at all. He's actually a great wrestler. His gimmick in OVW originally was that of a Russian shoot fighter and he was awesome. His matches are only uninteresting crap because he's booked to be a joke.

A TOS violation, yes. I'll give that. But that's irrelevant to whether or not LPs are fair use. YouTube can add in their TOS that you can't make videos with the color blue, but that doesn't mean there's something wrong with blue. And if LPs are found to be fair use ever, YouTube will almost assuredly change its TOS to

If you also have a soda shop that has millions of customers, then yes. It's your soda that's bringing the 200k-1mil customers. The top YT LPers are people with hundreds and hundreds of thousands of subscribers from OTHER channels of theirs. They started LPs because it's a quick way to have reason to put out a lot of

Uh, they do. They're called vlogs, and the most popular YouTube LPers still get thousands of views on those as well. Why? Because their audience is there MOSTLY for them! If someone just wants to watch the game, they'll find a copy of the game uploaded by itself.

Yes it does. Taking X route over Y or using super secret tricks is a hugely different thing than just playing through. Do you remember back before the internet, when tips and tricks would be traded around the school yard constantly? Hearing about X or Y thing from your friends when you didn't even know it was a thing

Rifftrax is still showing a movie in its entirety. A movie is the same no matter how many times you watch it. You're not gonna fire up The Lion King one day and suddenly Mustafa doesn't die. But you and another gamer can play The Walking Dead and end up with a different ending party due to half the characters hating

It's arguable. The amount of the original work isn't the only criteria. Other factors like how transformative the new work is or the artistic value of the new work also determine if the work falls under fair use. It's entirely arguable that good LPs are unique enough from the game itself to fall under fair use. Zack