Nihilexistentialist
Nihilexistentialist
Nihilexistentialist

First person mode could be incredible if done right. I find that the reason the Elder Scrolls games immerse me more than other RPGs is that simple shift in perspective.

The article states it includes season pass content.

False equivalence. What you’re proposing would require a lot of people to get involved with the update and would also require work from a different skill set. Adding a first person mode is a lot easier (and cheaper) overall.

Why was this a question at all? Plenty of games do this sort of release these days. Game of the Year editions in particular should be the most noticeable of such releases.

Betas are not demos.

Kind of an odd statement. PC gaming goes beyond Steam

In the past, President Obama’s test results—by the very same doctor—

I call BS on this. Amazon doesn’t make it obvious enough that you’re buying from a 3rd party. Once you know to look for it then it’s fine but many people don’t know that this even happens and thus don’t check who the seller is. Newegg pulls similar shenanigans.

Let me put it as clearly as humanly possible - 64kbps (any codec) will sound like dogshit against 128kbps (MP3, AAC, etc.).

Yep, I’ve had to pull them out before, it’s still a rarity.

Yep, I’ve had to pull them out before, it’s still a rarity.

It seems like wired ethernet is a rarity in hotels so I’ve always found this odd. Stayed at hotels of all sorts of varying qualities while traveling for work and maybe 5% offered this. When they did it was throttled so it was the same speed as WiFi. The NAS part of this would be useful at least.

It seems like wired ethernet is a rarity in hotels so I’ve always found this odd. Stayed at hotels of all sorts of

This requires having the means to do this in the first place. “Why don’t poor people just buy money?” is a meme at this point.

That’s quite the list of things that have absolutely no impact on your life. You’re part of the problem.

Talking about bitrate comparisons without mentioning a format makes anything you have to say about the subject worthless, it’s as simple as that. It’s a technical conversation. You don’t get to be vague. You certainly don’t get to be less vague than an article on a website that isn’t technical. You have to at least

People spend most of their time in their web browser and the rest in whatever applications fit their use case. No one is opening and using every single application on their computer. So who cares what computers come with? OSs like Windows and macOS are built for everyone and not specific crowds so they have a ton of

My bad for not checking if other people had called you out on something very basic.

By presenting a discussion point that doesn’t account for the fact that this article itself even mentions two different formats.

Part of why I tried Vivaldi in the first place is that it offered features I used to need extensions for in Firefox - but they were native. So when FF was just too slow for my tastes I moved over and have been happy. Trying out Quantum again I don’t think it’s terrible but it was too much work to get it similar to

Compared to what? I would be very surprised if it’s offering worse performance than the previous FF versions.