NightLite
NightLite
NightLite

That is what they literally wrote, how else are we supposed to take it?

Also, it’s become sort of a daily affirmation for me to actively acknowledge that this “fake news” bullshit is 100% about letting Clinton off the hook for losing the election. Nobody gave the slightest of shits about it before Trump won, and they’d have continued not caring had he been defeated. This fixation is a

Look up the word “glitch” and you probably have your answer.

Except that is how the legal system works. Stop and frisk is more a violation of the fourth amendment anyhow. If you want to get into stupid examples we can head over to Jezebel where they have no problem proclaiming guilt.

Any actual economist could rattle off a dozen reasons not to try, which is why we’ve never tried and never will. You don’t solve inequality by destroying an economy.

I imagine that the determination as to what constitutes an international health emergency to the WHO isn’t just some guy in a room getting in touch with his emotions on the subject. There is probably an objective set of criteria to make that call and doing so almost certainly triggers specific actions.

No offense George, But you’re background doesn’t exactly lend you credibility as a health expert. Your theories appear to be widely ridiculed by the scientific community as a whole. You are a futurist and at best that qualifies you to write sci-fi novels or advocate rights for semi-sapient species in the primate

Matt, Have you considered for a moment that your line ...

Come on. I’m pro-choice, I despise Trump, think the election result is a disaster. But can you not try to understand their viewpoint for one second? Dismissing them as “you don’t view women as people” just antagonizes them, and doesn’t solve anything. They view women as people. They also view foetuses as people.

I remember when io9 was a site that was capable of writing articles like this with nuance and maturity rather than knee jerk pearl clutching. Whilst this might well be considered a topic worthy of discussion, if you’re starting from a point of dictating where and when an individual of minority descent gets to use a

Since hate speech is generally accepted as “speech that offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.” that leave a pretty broad brush stroke by which speech could be considered hateful.

I’ve met Greg a few times, he’s a really nice guy. All of your east coasters that have never been to Twitter HQ or the neighborhood around it really have no idea, its a shit hole. Only thing I disagree with Greg on is that it hasn’t “become” a shithole, its always been one. And just so were on the same page, its not

That’s how evolution works man.

Seriously, if people need a disclaimer to keep them from doing stupid shit, then they’re too stupid to read a disclaimer. Like, we all KNOW that this is stupid and the guy most likely should have died. Does Casey putting “DON’T TRY THIS AT HOME” change that? No? Ok then.

Or that they are “beautiful human submarines.” Gotta be honest, I don’t understand what that means, but if my man Bone says it, I believe it.

Aw man let poor Ken be. He doesn’t deserve this. It’s all fun and games till Thiel comes after your ass on bone’s behalf. And then you know what happens? No rice cooker

But... but!.. Trump’s evil! The supports are so deplorable!

The only reason #repealthe9th ever trended was people talking about how horrible it was that #repealthe9th existed (then it continued to trend because then there were articles about how it was trending, and thus there must be a lot of people who think it should happen).

Its a chinese movie. They can cast whoever they want.