Okay. Delusional.

Well, you've either reached nirvana or are lying.

Not defending the author here but...you like it when people disagree with you?

Fair enough. But for future reference when someone accuses you of using a straw man argument, "exaggerating to make a point" is exactly what they are talking about. Once you change the variables it becomes a totally different point.

They struck her with a golf club. She should absolutely be entitled to additional compensation, court ordered if necessary. Not as much as say a person who dies from impact after falling from a cliff after blindly stepping backwards into it because of some direction from a photographer, and most certainly not half a…

Or you could tell a bunch of models you wanted to do a photoshoot, stab them all to death, then say it was a straw man shoot. That's pretty much the same thing as what happened...right?

Either a bad troll or stupid. Which is it?

Wow hahaha. +1. You get Internet award of turkey day

Wow. I did the same thing...I'm blaming on the bat being black, and seeing that in the corner of my eye while reading the title. Ignorance is bliss!!!!

Great comment. Thank you, from a resident of Louisiana.

Champion of the internets!

The point of these rules is to create a safe, competitive environment for these athletes to compete. If something, like doping, is deemed harmful, than it is prohibited, to allow these athletes to compete without being forced to harm themselves in order to win.

I was not familiar with Michigan voting. That is interesting. Your point about it shouldn't require money to vote is also interesting, and I would have to agree with you there. But isn't an ID required? Not just for most things, but simply to be in public. Aren't you required to have ID on your person?

Is that line from snatch?

"Boris the blade"

Nice find

Requiring an ID safeguards the system. Also, why don't democrats have IDs? It is not a huge request to ask people to have personal identification. I agree that this is way too close to the election to even consider changing a rule. But it shouldn't be something permanently ruled out because one side has more people…

This argument does not make it wrong to require IDs. I know you didn't suggest that, and thank you for the informative data. However, the argument still stands.

Finally, someone with the balls to speak out against the objectification of men. and what's that? You don't think people should mind gender or sex as well? Oh this is pure gold.

That makes perfect sense now. And it is a good point. However, I feel like its more the age of the victims than the gender, being that they could in no way give consent. But I agree, had a group of young girls been molested, it probably would t have been as large of a story, even if only marginally so.