I'm not going to read all of that, as I fear aneurisms. I did not mean to imply I had any direct legal knowledge, as is evident in my improper use of hearsay. :p

Many justice systems are reactive, not proactive. They act as a detterant, not a defense.

Do you know why the police don't take every complaint seriously? Is it because they are big meanies? No. It is because they cannot. They don't have the manpower, the budget, nor the legal precedent. All he is saying is take some personal responsibility. If a creep along a stretch of road threatens your life, contact…

Just keep making places up.

I'm an exotic parrot, and I take offense to that. "sqwaaack"

I am constantly impressed by the knowledge and reasoning of many people on this site. People like you keep me coming back. I say that honestly and without sarcasm.

To your last argument, we should push back even if we believe the particular action is in our best interests? I understand and agree with your argument in most cases. But refusing the breath test is used most of time by people who are above the legal limit or in fear of being above the legal limit. This should…

It is a greater intrusion, but what is the alternative? I am for a less invasive government in most cases, but when it comes to driving multi ton vehicles on state and federal roadways, I believe this is justified within reason of course. Also, what can they do with your blood that they couldn't already do with a DNA…

They shouldn't be able to draw your blood without medical supervision. If supervised, then by all means. They already take your breath. If someone is on drugs that impair their driving, even over the counter or prescription drugs, they should be treated like a DUI/DWI. Blood test would make this possible. People need…