Why? Because not enough citizens are writing letters to their elected representatives on a recurring basis to let them know that it’s important.

I’m happy to raise my daughter watching cartoons from sources like Netflix. She doesn’t have to watch one single commercial. Not one.

When my brother and I were little, Saturday mornings were for cartoons and chilling, at least when we didn’t have various sports events to attend. My parents would sleep in (or get frisky, probably) and we got to have hours of unsupervised fun, unlike Sundays which meant a stretch of oh-so-boring church services. I am…

I still watch cartoons every day of the week. No one can stop me!

What I really want to see is it actually get used. We all keep hearing about this wonderful miracle material and fantastic results from test applications, but what’s actually made it to market so far?

Sure, R&D takes time, but if it’s really the miracle material it’s touted to be, we should see practical applications…

This is about the most depressing thing I’ve read since the last time I read something about the state of the planet.

So your fine with people destroying others property as long as you dislike that person. Your parents must be so proud.

Arson is okay if they’re “asking for it”

Did I say “he should already be convicted without due process?” No, no I didn’t. All the shit you’re spewing is for the courts, which yes, he should get all of that.

And there’s the proof of your bias. Selectively picking stories that confirm this assumption rather than realizing that this kind of behavior exists regardless of sex/gender. “Certain type of female” says everything anyone reading your comments needs to hear. You don’t say “certain kinds of people” when it is beyond…

Sadly for this dude, these are the sort of allegations that you can’t really recover from. He can’t exactly come out and say “yes I acted inappropriately and am seeking counseling” because he’s such a prolific predator at this point that it’s not remotely credible as remorse, but it’s simultaneously an admission of…

This is true... and is why white supremacists can block “undesirables” from attending their events.

What on earth does that have to do with this? The constitution says the government may not punish a person until his or her guilt has been proven in court. It says nothing about how private people and organizations are supposed to interact with each other.

There will always be a segment who, when they ask themselves “What’s more likely, that I’m a jerk with a massive entitlement complex, or that those bitches are out to get me?”, will go for the latter, because it speaks to the entirety of their lives.

Do these idiots really think that people are gonna believe that a bunch of women are colluding to take him down because they don’t like him? So fucking dumb.

Neither of us matters. Why is the onus on the WOMEN to convince YOU? What the fuck do YOU matter? It’s insane... it’s like you can’t even see that you’re making the exact inverse argument as me. You’re the one who brought up “the onus of proof.” That only exists in a courtroom. You are not a court. I am not a court.…

The onus is on him to CONVINCE ME that all the women are lying. I am not a court. In court, the burden would be on the women to prove their allegations. In day-to-day life, if Susan comes to me and says, “Bob sexually harassed me,” and then Janet comes to me and says “Bob sexually harassed me and tried to rape me,”…

Of course false accusations occur. But it happens vanishingly infrequently compared to those who are NOT lying. When you have many women telling similar stories, the odds are dramatically in favor of their stories rather than the single man denying them. I call it “the Cosby principle.”

Wow, we finally made the troll angry! For the record, rape apologists like YOU make ME sick. So we’re on equal footing.

We found the Stanford rapist supporter!