It’s a tricky issue. On the surface it makes sense to help people in need. But there are too many anti-America folks sprinkled in to have this work in practice. We still don’t do a good job thinking like terrorists in this Country. So, our loose borders will continue to be exposed until someone really gives the issue…

.....her first statement will be, “How do you think we met?”....

I can, that’s true.

You must not know many real hunters then.

This is very common (i.e. normal) for pheasant hunting. It’s the same for most other birds, actually.

You see, pheasants don’t like to fly unless they have to. They are fast, nimble runners. And in tall cover, like we see here, they’re nearly impossible to see. The only…

When they say religious liberties, they mean something very specific. They mean the legal right to discriminate against gay people in housing, employment, and commerce. We might be able to get married, but they are still going to fight to keep us second class citizens. The war is not over. Gay marriage was just one…

At the very very bottom of the article, it says this:

You're ...... an ..... idiot ....

The deficit has actually decreased (FY2015 will be the first year it goes back up since FY2011 [source]). This is thanks mostly to revenue increasing as a result of the improving economy. Perhaps you're thinking of the debt.

I hope Denton sees this and other comments like this and and takes them to heart. No one should hear this from employees: What we've dealt with these past few months finally reduced me to tears.

I was never a star and I don't even care. Thank you guys. Onward my gray comrades!

yes, I gladly applaud when someone anti-human-rights is fired for being anti-human-rights, and complain when someone pro-human-rights is fired because some borscht-sucking robber baron got offended at support of human rights. Guilty. Of being on the side of good.

Nothing wrong with being an asshole, but he does have a point.

Again, Vic, read the story. This is a program where they ARE turning over data to private companies, in some cases, where there's no government oversight at all. You don't see anything questionable about that?

Wait a minute, are we saying that no one has personal responsibility? I'm amazed that everyone seems to forget that blame isn't either/or—you don't have to reduce the blame (or our disgust) of the Steubenville individuals to discuss whether the teenager did something reckless herself. I don't know if she did or…

To be fair, the youtube peer-review process is grueling, and comparable to most modern scientific journals. It's not like they let just anyone upload whatever tinfoil-hat crazy conspiracy theory they choose to blather on about in a video, right?