That's a badass looking machine.

that looks mean. do want.

The problem with $2,000 3rd-gen F-bodies is $4,000 C4 Corvettes.

Thirdgen F-Body. They are plentiful and can be found in any state of repair, for almost any budget, from $300 project car to $20k+ pristine show car/track monster. Parts are plentiful and cheap, they are relatively easy to work on. They can be everything you want it to be from restrained daily driver, to weekend…

I found this really Bitchin' Camaro IROC-Z $950. What's not to love?

I'm sorry, but that's bullshit. Market research by GM indicates that most of their Body On Frame SUV buyers use their SUVs for things that they couldn't do with brown manual diesel wagons, like towing large trailers, off roading, and carrying very heavy cargos.

Don't get me wrong. I'm not arguing that this fire was caused by nitrous oxide. It was clearly caused by a more traditional fuel. Orange flame is proof enough of that. Nitrous oxide will decompose to nitrogen and oxygen in the presence of high temperature or a suitable catalyst, and will release a whole lot of…

no way mang! i seen that shit happen, in real life!

Nitrous Oxide is non flammable by the way. It is used as an oxidizer. So the fire is not the fault of the Nitrous Oxide

Can't spell 'Murica without ACR!!!!!!

No one said the rule should be removed just for Tesla. The law as a whole should be removed. Not that it does anyone but Tesla any good anyways.

See people miss what exactly is going on. In Texas there are laws that prevent car companies from owning their own dealerships. They also prevent the company from answering…

Texas prohibits the legislature from meeting because every state legislature simply invents new ways to screw things up by catering the loudest crybabies and richest lobbyists of the day, rather than thinking clearly for the long term. The current anti-retail laws for car manufacturers are a perfect example of…

IF? i have been cut of by that but instead i was in a small Audi 80 and the guy was in a Ford Explorer and he was pissed that i didnt let him merge when i would have to hit the brakes and get rearended by a truck.

i definetly dont rationalize their behaviour I'm just not sure they ever where that threatening to the car before he ran over them (the first time). se for me driving over another human being is equal to shooting them and we dont know what truly happened sure they are criminal bikers but that doesnt mean they will…

Not sure who is "defending the bikers", but when I see the video cut, it seems like it starts out with the range driver tapping the rear tire of a bike cause he doesn't feel like slowing down... Did anything happen before this?

let me get this straigh i get that people think i am an asshole. i get that you think its a dick move to lock down a road. BUT when you say that me INCONVENIECING someone gives them the right to hit me with a F-ng car i feel you need your moral f-ng compass checked. if the guy had yelled at us we would have said…

If Obama had a son.....

This kind of behavior is found in other countries with their minorities. And when i say minorities i mean those criminally inclined people (it is documented that criminals around the world are a small percentage of the world population, so one can mention them as minorities when talking about social groups). Usually…

Here's my biggest problem with the whole drive towards automated cars: it removes yet another layer of personal responsibility from the individual.

It's pretty sad if someone needs a car to get laid. I don't know about you but I've never had to talk about my car or show it off to engage in coital relations with a woman.