Nekolas
Nekolas
Nekolas

I backed the bundle with extra commanders, terrain and solo/coop and have played it a few times. Really enjoyed it so far - I also like that their website offers errata rules, extra map setups (particularly the 3 player mode, 1v1v1 was a nice extra addition). The transition from basic rules to advanced rules work well

You don’t really have to pump money into it “to get anywhere”. It certainly makes you able to skip a lot of grind if you do though. And is the game fun? I don’t think people would play it if they didn’t have fun .. :) I played the game since release, and have more than 10k games, and I’m still having fun playing it.

If you want to get your hands on Kong or Godzilla (or both) in World of Warships, you’ll need to buy some special loot crates and hope you are lucky enough to get one of these titans. Or you could just buy the “Titans: Large Pack” for $150. It comes with both monsters and two big custom ships for them to ride around

I’m really liking this game, doing a full playthrough with a friend. In the demo I wanted to try the different classes, and the first I played was Pyromancer. Second I tried was Trickster, and I was sold immediately. There was no doubt in my mind that I would play Trickster, before even trying Devastator and

Probably because Zenimax became the parent company between Elder Scrolls 2 and 3, which means Bethesda still made plenty of good games after the Zenimax takeover.

I watched this quite some time ago, and while I don’t remember a lot of the details, it definitely left a lasting impression on me. I watched the whole thing with my then SO, which honestly kind of speaks to how compelling it is, because 74 episodes is quite a time investment.

I get where you are coming from Damon. Story time! Once a year I go on a trip with my family, and I’m the kinda type who stays seated and chills until the door opens and the queue moves. Simply because unless you need to stretch your legs, it seems silly to wait 5-10 minutes to get off the plane ASAP since everyone

Yeah it’s probably just me. Except for the fact that a whole lot of other people are scratching their head a bit as well?

It makes sense and I can respect it, but then they probably should also have branded it as a sideproject/DLC, and not as a sequel. It doesn’t feel like a true sequel :s

Probably because a sequel usually is centered around generally new/different gameplay/content. I get that the PvE stuff is new, but to make the PvP compatible with both games, they will have to be equal in content. Sounds like if you only care about PvP, then OW2 will just give you a graphical upgrade and some

So you can play all new maps and heroes with original Overwatch.. so Overwatch 2 just adds cosmetics and PvE stuff primarily?

Simply not good enough. Why are the commentators still suspended? Even if Blizzard believe they handled the situation wrongly, that is way too hard of punishment. They were not the ones who made a political statement, as far as I know. The correct thing would be to teach them how to handle similar situations in the

It is a fair question. Do you also wonder why people want to go take pictures of landmarks?

I got this + the first expansion in the first kickstarter. But shamefully I didn’t get around to trying it yet :< 

Doesn’t he kinda screw over a part of his loyal fanbase? While I don’t use it myself, it seems that a lot of people care about their subscription history to streamers, which is showcased in chat on Twitch. Some have years old concurrent monthly subscriptions. Or perhaps there is a way to transfer that to mixer?

It is called ‘ahegao’, a hentai (naughty japanese comics) term for when your mind goes blank from pleasure, and the persons facial expression ends up like you described

I think I’ve completely lost track of what you are trying to argue tbh. You end your whole post by saying “Apples and oranges, and the orange of CCGs is reliant on RNG quite a bit when players are of equal skill. “

Poker does not have that. When you lay down your hand, you know you have a full house. There is no chance for that full house to turn into a four of a kind or into a three of a kind because one card is determined after you play.

You say “pure luck”, but fact is that we are still talking probability. People put cards in their deck with a “random” chance because they believe it gives them a better win percentage in the end. They play them over other cards in certain moments because they calculate it to be the best play in a given situation.

I get your point, but somewhat disagree. When it comes down to the core, it isn’t different than poker. You play the cards on probability, even if there is a bigger random element to it