You're kidding, right? This is piracy. You're not taking the discs out of Apple's home, I realize, but you're depriving Apple of $20 for each item you take. The fact that it's an exploit via legal distribution doesn't change that. Take the software if you want, but let's not bullshit ourselves and pretend this isn't…

It's still stealing. You can tell yourself whatever you want if it makes you feel justified, but if you're taking something without approval, it's stealing.

It's a part of the incentive for buying a new Mac, not free software for everyone. If I buy a game console and it comes bundled with a game, that game isn't free for non-bundle purchasers to just take, is it?

Piracy in the loosest sense of the word maybe, but piracy all the same. Bizarre seeing this on Lifehacker, but at least it's not another embarrassing Sugru ad.

If you wrecked seven PS2s and three PS3s, the problem might be you.

I'm not sure you know what the word boring means if you think boring gameplay doesn't stop a game from being fun.

Actually, for all we know, it's a Microsoft game.

Always baffled by people who try something once, put it away and then blame the product for being poor instead of themselves for being unwilling to give it an actual chance.

Pretty ugly, but it's a start.

sorry, internet cop.

I'm stunned the Cardinal fans' accidental KKK sign isn't the top story on Deadspin right now. Isn't that right in your wheelhouse?

And all of those widgety things you do in Chrome, I can access via the Dashboard with one button press without disrupting whatever tabs I have open in Chrome. What's to understand?

Yep. Weather, sports scores, stock prices, a countdown til my PS4 is here and delivery notifications.

Just Android being Android.

Pretty sure that's what the hundreds of words surrounding the NO is for.

Really not enjoying this sudden rash of high school essays on Kotaku where the author writes the nut graph at the top, bottom and middle of the article.

That's ... weird. What's pretentious about valuing quality over new for new's sake?

Old whine is also factually wrong. I don't think you read this article correctly.

I can afford a lot of things because I don't work for free. And I'm happy to pay good developers, who never signed off on that "gentleman's agreement," so that they don't have to either.

I'm sure the general public won't care because it's the Wii U. But if someone's happy to pay $10-$50 for an improved game, I don't see why that should compel you to look down on them.