I’m a 38/40 H and I hook in the back first, then lean over and situate things. Lots of different approaches!
I’m a 38/40 H and I hook in the back first, then lean over and situate things. Lots of different approaches!
There’s a reason that people are disagreeing with you here, and it’s not because you’re the arbiter of ideal communication.* Either you suck at communicating your thoughts or your thoughts are bad. I think it’s both!
Hot garbage take, the sequel. What you wrote implies many people; don’t try to backpedal and act as if the commenters calling you out just didn’t understand you. I quoted your nonsense in my previous reply to you and I’ll embolden the key words here for good measure:
This is such a bad take:
Lots of dresses sell for thousands—all of couture and many designer dresses, for example. It’s not that wedding dresses cost an extravagant amount, but that many women choose to purchase a thousand-plus-dollar dress for their wedding when they’d normally not spend that much money on an item of clothing.
Lots of wineries and breweries are family friendly. My husband is GM of a winery and their tasting room keeps sidewalk chalk on hand for kids—this is totally normal and encouraged.
One year I gave a book of my original, extremely angsty poetry to most of my relatives as a Christmas gift, so that’s still out there, somewhere!
Sounds like you were a relatively protected tween. My fav touchstone teen movies are Clueless, Empire Records, Reality Bites... and I’m currently 34, so I was 12 when those came out. (Though I also loved She’s All That, Romy and Michelle, 10 Things I Hate About You, all which came later.)
Good for her! Now I’m going to hit that gas station up for my own lotto ticket like a weirdo though.
You just made me lol for real!
I agree on you re: Uber vs taxis, because there is a lot of grey area there. And I really don’t like Uber’s company practices (they treat their contractors terribly) even though they are convenient.
That’s not what’s happening in this story at all. This story has been extensively covered by Jalopnik — there are links in the post above. There is no one parking on the street. It’s a rural area. There’s ample space between his home and his neighbor’s home. He’s not breaking any zoning ordinances.
That’s not what’s happening in this story at all. This story has been extensively covered by Jalopnik — there are links in the post above. There is no one parking on the street. It’s a rural area. There’s ample space between his home and his neighbor’s home. He’s not breaking any zoning ordinances.
Thank you!
From my perspective it’s silly to assume that because someone is marrying someone else that they’re moving on “too quickly” ... or at all. It is possible to love two people at the same time — when a loved one dies, does it make us love our living family and friends any more or less? Presumably, a person could lose a…
Thanks, I misread bc there was no quote formatting and then it was too late to edit my comment. I suppose I was replying to Kanneck’s comment via Gearoid.
Psst: This isn’t Kotaku or Gizmodo. No one makes you click headlines except you.
Since Madwoman in the Attic thinks critique is important, I’m reposting my reply to her comment that she dismissed here.
It’s just another form of “mean girls”. The super ironic edition.
Your critique is garbage dressed up in feminist dogma. All you’ve done is proclaim people are awful because they discussed their looks (and their desires re their looks) openly. I hope you can realize that this opinion is so extreme that it wraps all the way around and smacks right into patriarchal Puritanism.