You don't get to pick and choose what counts as racism or not. It doesn't become more acceptable either because an over privileged white feminist gives it a pass.
I might have given your post some actual thought had you either stated some of the things that MRA's were actually concerned about (aside from the draft) or given some examples of this "white male burden" of yours.
Your patriarchy has granted women a protected and easy existence, even up until now. That same patriarchy has seen countless men slave and die to make it happen, while no one so much as raises a question about that.
He clearly isn't a feminist. Every good little feminist knows that girls don't have privilege.
What about it? Do you think the hatred of men is a laughing matter?
So how's about that feminist version that talks about castrating men?
I forgot that you're in the business of hiding from any information that shakes your faith. Its not even from an MRA site, ass. You can look that page up yourself and see the same damn thing.
If you don't like my sources, then I will discount yours on the grounds of misandry for not including male rape victims.
From the CDC. Note that, yet again, forced envelopment is considered separate from rape.
No it isn't. The DoJ clearly states as much, as does the CDC. They consider forced intercourse to be vaginal, anal or oral penetration. Hell, one of your own citations clearly says as much.
Or because you didn't read up on Mary Koss like I suggested. You really should have read those links, because there were emails to and from the CDC asking them to clarify why forced envelopment was not considered rape.
I don't see that anywhere. Only vaginal, anal or oral penetration.
1.27 Million. Same as women. So much for your oppression olympics.
OK, so where do they "include" being forced to penetrate another? IE rape by envelopment?
Which is defined (by them) as vaginal, anal or oral penetration.
You're not too clear on what that means, are you? It means being penetrated in the vagina, mouth or anus.
I don't seem to recall ever being schooled, or what that may have to do with your faulty definition of rape.
I don't seem to recall ever being schooled, or what that may have to do with your faulty definition of rape.
Those "facts" of yours serve only to undermine what you say. Yet another govt source that fails to include rape by envelopment. Yet another instance of institutionalized misandry.