Tyler, are you going to write a piece on Turkey’s de facto invasion of Iraq with an Armored battalion yesterday? Also, is it worth writing about?

I can guess the X35 won because of mission creep and it promised more.

Maybe I should have added: “Has a sufficient payload” and “Doesn’t require a specially refitted flight deck to operate off of”

Either that or a new plane made to do the same mission but keeping the same design philosophy.

If someone were to design a dedicated VTOL jet similar to the Harrier but with modernized engine, avionics and more efficient ducting (and maybe a better optimized airframe if such a thing is possible). How would it compare to the F35 B?

Yagoda get out of here.

“have been profitable for decades” is not going to hold a business from improving its product line and if you think the new Powerjet will make its way onto an Antonov, your are mistaken.

Because when you are running a freight company, you have to worry about the bottom line. Not so much when you are in a strategic bombing wing in the military.

I cannot overstate the service this man has done to both the automotive community and the world as a whole for deiving this rare beautiful machine the way it was meant to.

I can only assume putting the GE Turbofans on will save on fuel costs.

You win a war by taking and holding ground. In Vietnam, it was take ground, give it up and take it again tomorrow repeated for years.

It is no longer the days of Agincourt where a battle would happen on a field between towns.

They would see this:

This is no more sponsors than an Audi LMP1 has had in many years.

Looks like the nose of an AMR-One + the body of an ARX 03-C + a canopy.

Introducing the new improved football player.

It is not even a question.

We have a picture of the lead suspect:

Thanks for reminding me. No one made that “Top 10 timeless car designs” list yet.

NASA will never be responsible for putting a man in space again. Look to SpaceX and XCOR for the future.