I think it depends. In the city or around other people, yes, that is not good. But if you are in the middle of nowhere then, no, not so bad.

I am pretty much in the same boat, not as heavily tattooed but I have two full half sleeves and pretty much my whole left side, waist to shoulder done. I am not all that small either, 6'3" I got a few funny looks but really every time I go I have a great time!

That is a different. It matters in a different way for tax reasons, not for the stupid argument of high specific output somehow makes a great engine.

This, this right here. Any time someone brings this up in an argument, they are immediately discredited to me.

I see three of them around Austin a lot, all of them are gorgeous and I always wonder if they know how much one would go for.

I am going to be interested to see how they accomplish this. I mean the C6 Z06, not a big car, used a fair amount of CF, Aluminum and Magnesium, balsa wood....ect to get to that sort of weight.

Ahhhh you will get there, everyone was there at some point in time. Just keep on learning, it is always a great feeling to learn something new about cars and how they work, epically when you can put that knowledge to good use down the road.

That was the CTS.

I get those too but I guess I have been using it so much I just got used to it.

searchtempest.com is where it is at, if you like looking on craigslist.

It really is gorgeous.

There, American built GT40. The MkIV.

You are correct. I was mistaken, for whatever reason I had HP stuck in my head when I was reading this.

Measuring the torque at the wheels would result in even less torque. So the Spark EV would still have more.

I already gave up, I was just feeling a little rambunctious this morning and thought I would try........then I realized there is no point in trying to point out that huge specific output numbers are not indicative of great engineering or that displacement is not a tell of efficiency. I gave up after I hit publish on…

All of those while they will produce a higher specific output will not make the same torque and will not have a flat torque curve, they will not get as good of mpg, and they will not be as light or as small as the 6.2L. It is a dumb measurement they really do not tell anything about the engine at all. And once again,…

Specific output is a ridiculous measurement. Also there is the thing of OHV vs OHC. Of course they are going to make different types of numbers.

Those are also a trio of fatasses compared to the Corvette. Also, I would say that 3.8 to 60 is insane for the base car that cost just over 50k.

Hard Crack Pipe. What the hell?