But life continues one,

Just as odd as you living in a separate reality void of any genetic similarity among the human race.

To you? Perhaps. Sadly, her whole facial structure is different, each trade and proportion is different, so it hold very little water. Neither is that how a younger Ellen Page would've looked, Ellie's features are too full for that.

I can think of zero. She's easily distinct to you, to where you are, to what you've seen. Sorry, she's rather generic by European standards (As far as I've seen any-way). Hell, I had a girlfriend once that had similar facial structure. (Pitch black hair though) So, nope. Not really distinct.

That is exactly why there isn't any ground for a lawsuit, if they stuck to their original design (Whether or not based off Ellen Page or not), there'd be some merit to it, but since they went out of their way to prevent that confusion by redesigning Ellie, there's simply nothing there to imply that they willfully used…

My opinion is right, your opinion is wrong! RAWR, YOU IGNORANT. < Your post in a nutshell.

Or you over glorifying Elen Page.

If anyone won, it'd be PC. There's very little in the way of compelling (to me) exclusives, there's very little in exclusives any-way. Exclusive for console, sure.

They did mention that it wouldn't be there at launch, implying they do want to bring it in. They might even want to bring it in for both the disc and digital content, which would explain them needing more time, as the absence of mandatory verification complicates that process, or at least doing that process in a way…

I think it is still there, just dormant, bidding its time. But given the confusion around all the ins and outs of the Xbox One over the past weeks, I reckon they are focusing on sending out an as clear as possible message.

You could play the game, since it'll download what it needs to start playing and stream the rest in while downloading... both consoles do that by the way.

I am, but it is definitely a mixed bag. I'm actually semi interested in getting the console now, but I can see how those who already bought into it are a bit peeved. Though, they still seem intend on bringing some of that new stuff around when they are ready to do so. Like the sharing library, just not at launch.

Well, for what it is worth... I aint raging, I'm just baffled that they reversed their decision so fast and to that extend.

Really...? That was fast, if it is so.

I see your 23% and raise you a 24%, which is the plan to introduce here. The joy! We're at 21% currently, so I can relate to your pain.

That's a rather depressing note, but I'm afraid you could be very right. It appears as if Electronic Arts (Least), Ubisoft and Microsoft (Most) are pushing for that through persistent online worlds and seamless single-player to multi-player gameplay.

Oh, how common buyers remorse is. I share that regret at times. I used to purchase the latest titles at release for console... what a waste of money that turned out to be. I wouldn't quit my job, but I'd definitely be in a different tax category as far as savings would go. I'd feel rich every day, till the tax men…

Yes, because being able to play off-line for an infinite amount of time after activation and twenty-four hours is comparable...

I recall them being sued for not having that in Germany. Think that case is still on going, so maybe it'll be here sooner rather than later if the lawsuit is in favor of consumers.

Same here, same here. I do have time, but I tend to stick it into titles I've already played...