Mine is sitting simulator 20xx

Ohhh, I remember that one. Not long after, there was the controversial ruling in which they upheld an assault conviction in Mother v. Cracked Sidewalk.

Yeah, I don't think it should be beyond exploitative marketing, it's just that I can't see any way to market a theme park off the concept that doesn't glamorize ideas/a society that the entire book's concept is opposed to. The setting of the Hunger Games is an incredibly diseased society, and the point of the series…

I don't see how anything from Hunger Games could be turned into an amusement ride. I'd gladly go walking through a museum to see props and costumes, but can you imagine a ride where you get flung off a spinning island into a lake made of blood rain? I can. It doesn't sound fun at all.

I know you're not a lawyer C.A. So i'll understand your ignorance at the importantence of the "Finders Keepers, Losers Weepers" precedent establish by the Supreme Court in the hotly contested case of Rubber v Glue.

I totally agree about the diamond thing. If a guy had proposed to me with a diamond I would have been appalled. It's (1) a huge waste of money, (2) a horrific industry, and (3) nothing but marketing by deBeers and the other cartels that has suckered people into thinking a diamond is a necessary part of a proposal.

I don't wear mine most days because I'm terrified to take it into the gym or leave it in my car. I thought maybe I was just being paranoid and should chill out until yesterday when my husband came home from the gym with no wedding band. Luckily a guys band can be replaced for like $15 on eBay.

My husband and I don't generally wear rings. Well I never wear mine, between riding horses and really not being a ring person. He didn't have one at all but he travels for work and was complaining about being hit on or people judging him for not wearing a ring. So I got him an $8 one that looks cool and has a…

Not that it changes your point about not wearing them when active, but the "can't cut off titanium rings" idea isn't fully accurate.

My mom and dad never had wedding rings. When they were getting married they were way too poor to buy them and thought it would be extravagant. 20 or so years into their marriage he got her a beautiful emerald ring that I covet, but she doesn't wear it on her "ring" finger. On her "ring" finger is a ring that her…

I feel like part of the reason my parents have such a strong marriage (41 years and they're still best friends) is that they are totally into each other and totally not at all into the trappings of their marriage. They're actually sort of hilarious about it. I remember one day my mom walking into the room and saying…

My parents don't wear rings either and they've been married almost 30 years (28? I'll have to ask my Mum). The ring does not maketh the marriage.

I'm with you. We stopped wearing our rings around year 2. We are currently bearing down on our 24th wedding anniversary. Still married. Still happy.

Mr. Barge and I both break out in icky dry-skin rashes under our rings (do you think it's a sign?!) so we never wear them either.

I have had this argument on Jez before. I wear my wedding set when I want. And I don't wear it when I don't want. Totally doesn't mean I'm not married during that period - just means I don't want want to wear my wedding set, and fuck off.

I would agree that focusing on wedding rings is silly. I would hate it if people speculated that I was divorcing on the occasional day that I forget to put on the ring. But I have heard a lot of ringless gossip bits over the years that ended in divorce.

Oh, Harry Shum. I volunteer.

Brent are you creating a burner account FROM WITHIN THE GAWKER OFFICES? I AM LOOKING AT YOU RIGHT NOW. OMG WHAT SMUT ARE YOU TYPING?!?!?

Oh, boy. Um. This isn't about me. This is about someone I was (and still am) with.