From William Shatners "I Can't Get Behind That"...

The beetle at 1:35 is a winner, winner, I got tossed out of my car.

I can't say as I've ever been behind the wheel of the R-Spec V6, but I have seen them around with the full kit and they look nice. They don't sound so good though. Was that your experience as well?

I realize you used quotations to be glib, Mr. Orlove. Stop it.

If this thing had 100 more horses it would RUIN the drive. Tell me I'm wrong if you want, but I've driven the damn thing and let me tell you that more Horse would ABSOLUTELY ruin that car... now a slightly better torque number would be nice, but even then nothing too insane. Maybe 50 more lb ft of torque... at best.…

Having driven the same, with the auto, I have to say I agree HOWEVER and YET but ALSO this isn't a car about power, it's not a car built to produce mountains of torque and while a great many auto-journo's have agreed stating that it's a great car but could use a little more power, I don't agree. Would I buy it if it…

You are clearly not familiar with Winnipegers.

Or these ones?

Where do these fall?

The sedan looks good, in the same way Mazada6's have always looked good. That wagon, however; is pure sex. I know it's the same FWD chassis, and I know it'll be a great performer in it's demographic, but I just want, want, want a RWD version of that car. Looks like the clownshoe grow'd up and got a day job.

That looks excellent. In fact, by shape alone, it looks as though it was designed to compete with the A3. I want to see a non-hybrid, AWD version. Am I alone?

It's like looking down at your Morning Would.

It's like being king of a kingdom but not really being king.

Constitutional Monarchy FTW, eh?

I will acknowledge that with the caveat that utilizing a democratically elected government while simultaneously declaring oneself a Monarchy is also logically ridiculous.

I still contend, and rightly so, that your statement that the Queen of England is "literally" above the law is incorrect. And that age old argument of Royal Assent is such a bogus rap to fall back on as it has been an argument rendered moot by many scholars and as such I'm not going to debate the reach of those…

There is a Queen of the Commonwealth, a union of nations which was formed under and by the British Empire, to which Canada belongs. And as such Queen Elizabeth II is titled "Queen of" in regards to said Commonwealth countries, however; her title is purely an honorific - Canada is no longer legally part of the kingdom,…

No, she is not literally above the law. Nor is any member of the Monarchy. It's called The Magna Carta Libertatum, or The Great Charter of Liberties of England and the United Kingdom, and it's very purpose (amended and rewritten over time) is to ensure that within the Commonwealth, the powers of the Monarchy are not…