With exceptions, they are very brilliant, adult lawyers (not law students) often in their 30s, doing this for 1 year to further launch their careers so they too can become judges or law professors one day, and if they decide to go back to private practice, they get huge bonuses (250K) as a function of being former…

That, my friends, is how you eat crow with some dignity. Glad to see there are people willing to admit a mistake, apologize, and not walk it back at the end.

Dammit, the answer was exercise. I was trying to avoid that.

He didn’t need to bring her up at all; the interviewer didn’t ask about her- he just kept bringing up how horrible she was to work with out of the blue. He’s got issues with an actress who seems to have been uncomfortable being alone with him.

So, she totally rebuffed his flirting and he’s taking his hurt fee-fees to the media, right?

I’m not crying. Nope.

Timely!

Jesse Hughes comes off as a horrible (traumatized) dickhead... but what a fucking shitty awful interview to stage with someone so thoroughly traumatized, to feed him these prompts to just spin into horrible bullshit so you can get a boost for your shitty conservative rag of a website. Like, taking someone with…

When you see footprints beside you? It was then that the metal carried you.

Assuming California Law applies here.. It isn't like she gets half of everything he has. She gets half of what they both made during the 15 months they were married.

Shoutout to all my lawyer Jezzies. For us (at least for litigators) we sort of have ethical standards about what to wear. Lawyers have to disappear in court — it’s all about the client’s needs. You have to be effectively communicating and advocating for the client. If someone is noticing your clothing instead of your…

The bill would have prevented people with restraining orders taken out against them from procuring firearms. In order to get a restraining order taken out against someone, the person angling for the order has to provide the judge with enough reasonable proof that the person would harm them if in close enough…

I thought I edited it before anyone saw! Noooooo!

Christie conditionally vetoed a similar bill in November 2015, saying he’d rather focus on making it easier for domestic violence victims to get guns of their own.

So Christie wants the burden of preventing assault to fall on the victim...who, best case scenario, has to turn an assault scenario into a gunfight with the abuser? K.

Men who can’t handle challenging women seem to be the rule, not the exception. Just as challenging women who haven’t had that aspect ground off by life (or self-suppressed) are the exception - especially if they value relationships. Almost all relationships require compromise. Not poking. ;)

I related to more of this than I feel comfortable with, to be honest. These are hard things to admit or say, even to one’s self.

But this is a genius casting move because when no one knew who the hell Jake Pavelka was, he was able to explain for the men and the audience. So we’ll have on-screen commentary as long as he lasts on the show. Plus, he makes Chris uncomfortable, which is always a bonus.

It sounds like you’re one of the good ones in the Wedding Industrial Complex, but I’m pretty sure that I read that Halliburton is the largest supplier of wedding flowers and most cake toppers are constructed by Lockheed-Martin.

“Reading About Feminist Weddings Is Exhausting”. Believe me, it isn’t anywhere near as boring as reading about someone reading about feminist weddings was.