Why is it clear enough for so many people then? Why is it only dicks that it's not clear enough for?

We're into blatant trolling territory, here, right?

It isn't just that they're conditioned for it, although that is entirely true. It's also that soft nos work better, period. For everyone. It's actually good conditioning. No one likes to be told no when they want something, but people who hear hard, confrontational nos are more likely to have their feelings hurt.…

Just look at how many Recommends your posts have compared to those of the people disagreeing with you. Can't you consider, for one moment, the other side of this in a rational way? You seem to truly lack the capacity for empathy that is so integral in being a human.

I actually don't see it. Can you point a lay man to the part of the article where it shows there's 8GB of DDR5 for gaming and 2GB of, separate, DDR3 for the OS? Thanks.

It's not that HBO doesn't want your money. I believe the reason for this not happening is cable providers using preexisting contracts, as well as threats to stop carrying HBO programming. Cable providers desperately fear being cut out. If you don't need cable to have HBO, think of how much money Comcast, TWC, etc…

I, too, dislike censorship, but I do see a difference between institutionally or legally mandated censorship, versus a company self-censoring to earn more sales in a certain market, or avoid controversy.

I think I bit off more than I realized here. That's no insult at all. I love an intelligent and civil discussion. I haven't read any of your past posts, though I appreciate you taking the time to read mine and understand some of my perspective. I also appreciate you saying I seem like a nice guy and I like to think of…

Why would it be a waste of your time, when this argument isn't? I'm interested, now. What am I missing?

When discussing personal opinions and ideas regarding such a specific and controversial topic, it's impossible not to have a take on the subject. You have one as well, so you are equally prone to said self selection bias.

And you likely couldn't know how much I know about logic, so I reject your statement due to your…

From an outside viewpoint, speaking purely in terms of logic and reason, you're getting wrecked in this argument.

No, people need to be kind to one another.

No worries about the dismiss. Thanks for the effort to fix it. I appreciate your reply.

I don't see any sign that anyone seemed "legitimately" or otherwise offended or upset. People just seem to have opinions they want to discuss and so they came here, to a discussion board, to do so. The OP posted on a public forum, inviting others to engage in discourse, and they did.

I really don't think the best game of the year should be decided on how many platforms it's on. I don't care if it's a DS game, a PC game, or game only released in Japan. The best game of the year should get the Game of the Year Award.

I see your point, but then what category would Bioshock Infinite be able to win best game? Although it's the story-telling and characterization (among many other elements) that make it great, it's a FPS. It's not an adventure game or an RPG. Seems unfair to disinclude it because it's best features aren't related to…

I don't know about his voice acting chopped, but I think Shia LeBouf is pretty talented. Not that that was your point.

What I'm saying is that it isn't being judged on it's shooting mechanics. You can argue that it should be, but in this case it seems it was just the best game that was of the shooter genre.

I agree with you, I think it will deal with some famous past. The show regularly references major past events, as the book did, and so any of those events you mentioned are possible.

I think it's just that it was the best game that fell into the shooter genre. Not the game that best exemplified the shooter genre, necessarily. Or the game that had the best shooting mechanics.