Nope.

Good point. Clever stuff.

But you are racist. You classify a people negatively solely for their race. That's racist.

Whoa. Line crossing. Come on.

That's an odd explanation.

Really? Does that work? I can just give it to myself when/if I'm ready to play?

I think the problem might be the very fact that it assumes the writer is male, simply because the letter is using stereotypes regarding women in the most visible option. Even if it's doing so in the assumption that the writer is stupid, which is most likely is not, it still puts these stereotypes, which are already…

Man, I've never seen your posts before or anything, but in this thread you come across as a real dick. You jump to such monstrous conclusions, even for the internet.

I am not bias against him because he is a white male, by the way. Nothing I've said suggests that. And it's absurd to suggest that because a problem isn't THE single biggest problem, it shouldn't be addressed. Video games are a subculture. And the larger culture, defined by such subcultures, needs to change for…

I was never arguing with the points of view expressed in the video. I was defending what, to me, seemed to be the point of view that scottmbruner was coming from. People were misconstruing his view regarding the opinions of white males. I was saying, "I think you're misconstruing his point." I didn't say he showed all…

Right, for one thing. It's also a great deal better researched and presented. And the quality of the editing and sound is quite clean and polished. Great use and integration of clips, as well. She asked for $6000 and got a lot more, by the way.
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/56642…

He didn't dismiss the argument because it came from a white man. He didn't dismiss it at all actually. He listened to it and argued against it. But, he disagreed because it was illogical, not because the guy was white.
It does, however, sound worse to me to hear a white male saying women, blacks, Mexicans, or any…

You don't understand freedom of speech. You're not using logic. Quit giving it a bad name. You're creating an argument the other side never made and arguing against it. It's called straw-person logic and it's a logical fallacy. You can look it up.

No one is trying to take anyone's freedom's away. It is her page,…

Try growing up. That's good advice.

It was and continues to be hard to get away from racial stereotypes and misconceptions, and the cycle those perpetuate, but we still must examine our culture and chip away at those issues. This is no different. The first thing is identifying the problem, and that's largely been done. Now people have to discuss the…

Almost every statement you've made here that could be taken as a fact is not inaccurate. Also, most of your arguments are based on flawed logic, mainly straw person. Meaning, your arguments are based on a misrepresentation of your opponent's positions. If you want to know what Sarkeesian actually thinks, you can watch…

No, he clearly stated that these arguments would be invalid no mater who gave them. But, I think he's saying, those who reap the benefits often want to keep on doing so and might not be the best authority to argue against giving them up.

He did not say that. You're jumping to get there. You're nitpicking one sentence out of many, taking it well beyond its meaning, and refuting only that. It's a useless way to argue that has no value. Your story was not cool, bro.

She is criticized in hundreds of public places.

SO much angrier.