No you don't. Not even a little bit. ASk the single mother working two minimum wage jobs if, when her 7 year old son broke her arm, if his healthcare was "basically free."
No you don't. Not even a little bit. ASk the single mother working two minimum wage jobs if, when her 7 year old son broke her arm, if his healthcare was "basically free."
If you look closely, she's in her right boot.
are you KIDDING me with this. also, i couldn't stop staring at those filthy, dirty tweezers. Just all-around naaaasty.
You're misreading my comment. What I am saying is that there is no way in hell you as a man would stay in a relationship for 44 years with a woman who never once made you cum. In 44 years, you never finish and just tell everyone, "Oh, it's ok, I don't NEED to orgasm. I still love sex with her!" Of course you would…
OMG, I'm with you, emollama. Well said! How much of this "problem" is that men are simply *not* taught to please women, to care about their orgasms, to make sure that they happen? That men are taught, on the regular, to degrade women—that humiliation is natural for sex? Yeah, it's really not that big a wonder so many…
Pretty sure it's "stop pretending that it's OK for coupled sexual pleasure to be so uneven and that it's not a problem for so many" since this article is primarily about ladies who aren't getting off and are (at least claiming to be) ok with that.
Can we fucking stop with this shit? All this talk. All these articles about how sex can be great, suuure, without orgasms. ONE LITTLE DETAIL in all these articles though - almost all the women who don't come with their man are usually getting themselves off alone. I don't know about anyone else, but when I MASTURBATE,…
The Unrealistic Demander: possible gold digger, or wants someone who shares her socioeconomic status (big predictor for successful relationship)
Well, now you've jinxed them. The end is nigh.
MARK WILLIAM DAVID SHRAYBER. That headline and that picture. You need to take a seat over there and think about what you've done.
Why is it infuriating? I reached my opinion based in part on hearing Adnan himself talk, and a whole host of other information the jury never got to hear. Besides, I'm not a juror. I'm a person listening to a podcast. I'm convinced he killed her. My opinion means nothing.
The fact that Adnan never tried to reach Hae after she disappeared clinched it for me. I remember hearing that and thinking "okay, yeah, he totally did it."
I don't think Jay is all that sketchy, really. And why would he kill Hae? I think Adnan roped him in because Jay had a reputation of being a liar and a bullshitter, and Adnan counted on people believing him, the golden child, over Jay.
THANK YOU. It baffles me that any of us who read this site would have any trouble believing that a young man strangled his ex-girlfriend.
Adnan killed her. I am honestly baffled by the number of people that have a hard time believing this.
You are for real with this garbage. Can you not realize that I'm angry because people have their foot on my neck. Racism isn't just some annoying quirk people have. It's not a pet peeve. I be you're one of those, "I don't see color" type assholes. Racism made me angry. People like you, treating racism as "that…
YESSSSSSSS so much of the general media conversation will end up being diverted back to white people because that's the dominant voice. Why not be a decent person who, rather than eclipse the voices of black people, uses that voice to call out other not-so-great white folk? It's like that Tuohy article and her using…
I've always found it ironic that we white people always seem to accuse the people we force (whether literally or through dearth of alternative employment) to do our most difficult, menial tasks of laziness. Blacks are lazy? Who the fuck performed manual labor of unspeakable difficulty for centuries without pay?…
Every time a man puts a my little pony in a jar and jizzes into that jar for months, an angel catches on fire and dies.