Maveritchell
Maveritchell
Maveritchell

That's their "fault," if you can call it that. It's a tech demo - they obviously just used some quick placeholder models to test a concept.

@Culebra: A fine substitute for the oldie-but-a-goodie "headlight fluid."

@xor24: There's the basic Catan online game:

I don't think I'll be entirely satisfied until I see a reimaging of Baby Commando (oh the horror!):

@interkin3tic: I don't much care for the new layout either, but it's worth mentioning that the promote buttons were recently fixed (they're on the right-hand side of the comments).

That's fine, it has been a long time since he's been in one, but my point is that it's not unfamiliar territory - it's not a "big jump," since he's already been there before.

What is worse is the guy who chimes in to correct without doublechecking - remember that Superman keeps a nature preserve in the Fortress (Batman doesn't keep one in the Batcave, which is probably why the poster mentioned Superman's winter home):

Deadline is reporting the news that the indie movie star, Gosling, is ready to make the big jump to a massive studio tent-pole production in Logan's Run

She did do the recent arc where Ventress worked with the Nightsisters to attack Dooku - that was a pretty fun three-parter.

Having a cheat mode on doesn't carry over into a dissociative experience. The concern is that the similarity in context is what will trigger post-traumatic stress symptoms, not the similarity in content.

You're right - you do appreciate something more if you have to work from it, and it's definitely a valuable lesson to be taught. However, I would still contend that the nature of a gift is that it is something one shouldn't (or doesn't) have to work for, and let's be honest - parents of any stripe give their children

Whoop! You went way over-the-top there on your critique of kids and parents. Yes, this is the way capitalism works. Yes, there are spoiled children and parents willing to cater to them. Neither of those mean that all (or even most) parents buying their sons or daughters a new toy when it comes out is enabling some

"Don't deserve" is a pretty heady appellation. The way I figure it, if you bought the game, you deserve to see all of its content. One's own conscience can dictate how good he feels about it, but in any piece of solo entertainment, it only seems logical that the only barriers between enjoyment and the user should be

I think - and I say this having only watched the first couple seasons and consequently having zero first-hand knowledge of what I am about to reference - that the contradiction is the fact that the show is about Superman and no one refers to him as Superman. In your James Bond example, it would be like having a show

@WhatTheFrag: All you're seeing are people's externalized rationalizations of one purchase over another. It's certainly not centralized to video game consoles - people like to justify anything they spend a lot of time or money on.

@BeerManMike: Castle of the Winds was definitely a fun one; got the first half in a shareware pack as a kid, years later realized the author had opened both halves up as freeware.

@MTVAH: Don't stop there, right next they tell you that Star Wars is based on Kurosawa and Campbell!

@Mr. Bean: I certainly can't speak with any sort of authority on the matter, but certainly any legitimate business that "sells" TV content (like Hulu, or Netflix, or cable on-demand, all as listed above) compensates the networks for their programming. If they support the shows (however incrementally) as ads do, then