Exactly, my car has ~375ft/lb torque and uses a 7-speed dual-clutch, it’s just fine.

It’s kind of like driving a manual and kind of like driving an automatic. You don’t use a third pedal (duh), but there’s no torque converter so a) you can roll backward on a hill when stopped and b) there’s no mushy slop while waiting for converter lockup, however....it isn’t as smooth in stop and go stuff as a…

“Too much torque to handle” seems to be code for “cost-savings”.

Swapping out a manual and a dual-clutch for a torque converter

You’ll need $165,850 to get one

It’s 2015. Who says it’s a straight male in those pics?

Agreed and agreed.

Their attempt at copying Mazda’s frontward design back fired tremendously. It just looks awkward from the front and like a disaster from Nissan at the back. The rear disaster definitely includes that C-pillar.

It’s kind of treading the same path as the Citroën DS4 did a few years ago.

It’s like an X1. People say its a hatchback, but its a fucking crossover.

I’m sure future humans will see this exact Camry on the road 100 years from now.

I’ve been to a karting day (not a race, just lapping) at a place that only requires gloves and a helmet and someone was rocking a full fire suit and HANS device. Needless to say, between our sessions we all sat at a different picnic table then him. Also, we were driving normal 40mph endurance karts, not TAGs or…

Who would have thought a 911 would lift-off oversteer? Certainly not someone who is famous for owning a shit-ton of Porsches...

Uh...you might wanna duck.

Made the same suggestion (minus the trailer). Not at all surprised that I wasn't the first to make it.

OR

In terms of new offerings, I think this is hard to beat:

This two will do.