MasterChef_117
MasterChef_117
MasterChef_117

It could be the only thing that gets me to buy it. I don’t do multiplayer games. At all. Full stop.

There we go. Dismissive immediately, incapable of admitting positive precedents, and inability to accept opposing opinions.

People like a thing you don’t like, ergo you are compelled to mock it. Because reasons, I guess.

I’ll bet they do the same type of campaign as BF1, by having a bunch of smaller (2-4) mission campaigns.

I really wish that Bioware would not have apologized for this, they are not wrong at all.

yea......blame “bernie and his bros”.....because they’re they ones who decided to leave wisconsin, michigan, and pennsylvania alone late in the election......they’re the ones who tried to market a plutocrat fembot as a “cool Hillary who dabs and is friends with beyonce”.....they’re the ones who made her use the

That was weird. I also found it strange that the author tries to justify (at least a little bit) posting the invasive photograph in 2012 by saying that we as a culture didn’t wake up to how horrible stuff like this was until 2014. Ummmm, what? No, I’m pretty sure most of us knew well before then that it’s not OK to

What revolutionary about Zelda? he can climb. that’s it. Nothing new compared to already existed open world. In this matter, Nintendo is way behind

I’m chuckling at the notion that the 28th official game in the longest running RPG series (http://nintendo.wikia.com/wiki/The_Legend_of_Zelda_(series)) is somehow “revolutionary,” but HZD isn’t? How about the fact that it’s the first satisfying AAA title to feature an independent female protagonist, who (as far as I

There’s nothing revolutionary about Breath of the Wild, game is good, yes, but it all has been done before, not on a Zelda game, but it has been done before, and better. 

Horizon Revolutionary, maybe not. Nearing or even reaching the pinnacle of evolution of the open world genre as we currently know it? Highly possibly. Aside from the rather unique take on combat it doesn’t do much new, but it does everything it does do, all so damn well.

Yeah I don’t get why everyone keeps saying it’s revolutionary when it seems to do what other open world games / Zelda 1 did.

Revolutionary for a Zelda title? Doesn’t seem that revolutionary in general terms.

The title is misleading. “Player lands a one hit KO” certainly implies that he simply hit his opponent once and won the match.

Not sure I would call that a one-hit KO; I mean, he led into it with those first five hits, so...

Been playing early access via EA Access. Pretty much haven’t seen any of the wacky shit that people keep giffing and posting. In fact aside from the “Addison” character who definitely has a case of stone cold robot face and a slightly janky sprinting animation I’ve been pretty impressed so far. I’m gonna chalk it up

The Division’s biggest problem is the developers don’t seem to have any idea what they want the game to be long-term. They released Underground, which was a decent idea, but have done nothing to improve or expand it, and have actually pared down the possible rewards for it. They released Survival, which is excellent,

I wonder how people think minor game assets are made then? I know in film we leave the pictures that come in the frames sometimes. Because that isn’t what the movie is about, and are we really going to do a photo shoot for a non essential piece of background decoration? I mean if it is something important yes but most

So a dude with more money than most people see in their lives chose to take advantage of economically-disadvantaged individuals for the sake of some anti-Semitic “humor,” and is now surprised that there are consequences that go with that kind of behavior.

Got it.

Having read some of the comments on the previous article

Oh okay.