Now, you buy your exceptionalism on the same shelf along with the other cheap plastic shit made in China.

Even so....not bad for a punter to avoid taking the sack.

That's not Kanye, that's The Stig.

So it sounds like this could be revisionist history:

you shouldn't feel guilty about being titillated unless I should feel guilty about going to check out the page ot see if I would be too! ;)

You know? I don't think you are objectifying them. The purpose of posting these pictures is to allow women who don't fit society's unattainable idea of "sexy" stand up and say "hey, I AM sexy, and here's proof!" I think they would be happy to know that people agree with them. It means they are right.

I thought your comment was good, especially since this article is about being sexy in lingerie. Finding a body titillating does not automatically mean dehumanizing them, aka "Objectifying".

It's sort of adorable how both she and her boyfriend were convinced they were "dating down." And were somehow both correct.

I don't believe in mocking high school students, so I'll refrain. Besides, there will be plenty of time to do so in a few years when she starts showing up at school board meetings demanding that her kids' biology teacher be fired, since we all know we don't come from no monkeys.

Given that Wednesday = Odin's day, Thursday = Thor's day and Friday = Frey's day, we need to change Tuesday to Sifday. Because you know those guys all come after.

It's refreshing to read a story about splatting on a boat that doesn't involve the Minnesota Vikings.

There's a house a few miles away from mine like this. The owner put a unicorn sculpture in his yard, and his neighbor's complained. At which point he was like "you don't like my unicorn? Fine, I'll add ten medieval knights around it!" and then kept going until his yard was full of awesome/weird spite statues. I…

Marinette is one of the biggest shipbuilders in the US and has quite a good reputation, the ship was built there because they won the bidding for it and that's where the company is located. Ships by definition move - doesn't matter where they're built. That's like going to a car dealership in California and…

i'm sure it was no consideration whatsoever. you're very likely asking that question for the very first time.

NOAA covers the Great Lakes, too. Perhaps they had a project up there first.

Another commenter responded to me with some insight about the capabilities of this specific builder — suggesting that they went where the expertise is. That made sense. My lone recommendation isn't enough to ungray it, apparently, but this is a smarter conversation with that person's voice in it.

My complete and utter lack of specific knowledge provides me with two possibilities:

1 lowest bidder type deal
2 maybe they need some great lakes work done too. itl do it on the way, 2 birds one stone

your retarded

Thank you, I thought there might be a legitimate reason, I just didn't know what it was. The resource I found referenced a unique type of keel design used in this ship, I wondered if it might be a proprietary design of that builder.

Most likely some senator had got a nice bit of "campaign money" to get it made there.