Yes, if the website said "These thin women's legs look like disgusting hot dogs!" I'd be with you. But it says "these legs look like hot dogs" which they unquestionably do, and without your implied adjectives (thin, women, disgusting) it's hard to see where the insult is.

Well there's this one, for starters...

Or alternatively a lot of different cultures discussed large creatures that could kill you, and this lore, when translated into English, was commonly translated as "dragon."

Are they for reals? This feels like Poe's Law to me. It's just... so absurd.

Right now I'm leaning towards both trolling and clueless; because it sure feels like trolling, but you're remarkably bad at it. C- effort at best.

But you do think they should if the design is from that race/culture or religion. So what you have a problem with is culture being shared, you're a segregationist.

You have the right to offend me; I have the right to express my offense. "A free world" implies that expression should not have legal restrictions, not that it shouldn't have consequences. Something can be legal and still be wrong.

It's a bit unfair to blame the porcupine for that.

Are numbers in Spanish significantly harder than numbers in English? That could explain the Spanish economy, I suppose.

As a penis-owner I'm 100% on board with you. A hundred laps in an Olympic pool is not a 100 meter swim. Fourty circuits of the track is not a quarter-mile run, it's a 10 mile run. One trip down does not a blowjob make.

Not to derail the conversation, sweep Joe McCarthy under the rug, or minimize the disaster that is Scott Walker, but Wisconsin has been at the forefront of progressive politics for a very long time. We even publish, the, um, Progressive. Bob LaFollette, Gaylord Nelson, Feingold, Baldwin. We are the birthplace of the…

I second that. One of the greatest shows ever made. Sadly only 13 episodes. Thirteen glorious episodes.

Pretty much nailed it.

Sounds an awful lot like they're banning speech based on the content of that speech. Isn't there a rule against that?

inb4 "OMG verticle videoz suxxors!"

Anytime I send even a slightly racy email or text I triple-check the recipient before I hit send. This is just sloppiness.

Any visible laser will show the beam of the laser if there's particles in the air for it to reflect off of. None will if there are not. It has nothing to do with the type of laser.

So vertical video is wrong, except when it's not wrong, when the action is moving in a vertical plane. I'm fine with that, though criticizing someone's framing in an amateur video is still pretty pedantic.

SHE'S 12. YOU CREEPER.

Really? You're going to stuff Ann Richards down the memory hole?