MadMage86
MadMage
MadMage86

If I put 2 cars into any of those driveways I’d block the sidewalk - and it’s not an uncommon sight. I’ve never heard of laws against this.

I do, however, know there are laws requiring your building number to be visibly displayed on your building and/or mailbox - but barely anyone follows that one.

See how you’re trying to justify it? That’s called cognitive dissonance.

First off, what happens between her and him is between them - not you. Even if she leaves him and you give it a go, nothing that happened before is your business. Period.

Second, the fuck are you doing at her place drinking? She’s taken. Back the

Call or email?

No, sir. We are beyond phone calls and keyboard smashing.

Now is the time for pitchforks and torches.

“For the record: yes, I am a card-carrying member of the ACLU. But the more important question is why aren’t you, Bob? Now, this is an organization whose sole purpose is to defend the Bill of Rights, so it naturally begs the question: Why would a senator, his party’s most powerful spokesman and a candidate for

I suppose my problem is with the premise of the question itself when it comes to sexuality in general: the core of the problem isn’t that seeing a woman’s body arouses men (and women), it’s that we consider the arousal itself to be wrong and shameful. The Japanese do not share this view - at least not the same way we

Hard to be creative when you’re given a limited palette to work with; Minecraft has been the same virtual LEGO set almost it’s entire existence, with the equivalent of 3 or 4 different colors and types of blocks to work with.

Not to mention, Terraria and Starbound may be more progression and adventure focused, but

THANK YOU DARK GODS OF BLIZZARD.

I don’t know, if your stance is ‘nothing justifies centering the plot around sexuality’, then I’d say that perhaps we’re being a bit too sex-negative here?

Not sure I’d call this an ‘unbiased’ take; it’s more than a little developer friendly.

I’m not saying he’s wrong that certain behavior is out of line, but I personally take every opportunity to point out developers who dropped the ball for a variety of reasons] and then proceeded to stick their head in the sand rather

Adding what, one mob at a time? I realize there HAVE been content patches, but they’ve always felt lackluster. One mob at a time or one overdue feature taking years to implement - the game has long put too much emphasis on the creative aspects and not enough on the adventuring and exploring.

All I’m saying is

This is everything Minecraft should have added literal years ago.

To this day I cannot figure out why content additions have always been so painfully slow to Minecraft; the core experience has been there since practically day 1. Why we were still seeing tired old zombies, skeletons, spiders and creepers after the game

Hell, there are still a ton of great PS2 games that hold up just fine.

I mean, sure, but how far into the game did you have to get before you had access to one? Halfway, at least?

Yeah... I’m wondering why this occurred to no one else. This is how the Jackson made Gimli look short next to the entire rest of the cast of the Lord of the Rings despite being hilariously taller than them.

You think that is pissed? Clearly you’ve never owned a Tortie.

I said ‘constitutional protections’, not the first amendment. I was not limiting my comment to free speech, but I did respond to your implying that students would have nothing to say worth discussing if a teacher bothered to show interest. You might be right in many cases, but often young kids being belligerent is a

So basically the adage is ‘shut up and listen’, right? Because god forbid the young have ideas and thoughts. They might not be wise, but wisdom is accrued through experience and the lack of both usually means you’re not weighed down by it. If nothing else, the thought that listening is in no way important while

I will grant that there are certainly exceptions and considerations made for minors, but the overarching, general protections should not themselves be undermined because of age.

It’s not just children that receive these kinds of exceptions, either. The elderly and infirm also have some rights suspended in the interest

I wasn’t speaking about free speech specifically. I am well aware that the protections for speech apply only to government agencies (which schools happen to be, but this is a bit of a fuzz area); I meant my statement in a broader manner.

Yeah... I mean, I get that protecting children is, to a certain extent, a parent’s job but insulating kids from everyfuckingthing is retarded.