You're right, fast is fast.

However, it was outsold in November by both the Nissan GT-R and The BMW i8.

Just to get a feel for how rare they are.

This is correct. It's really just a process of elimination. Really easy.

I lol'd at that, too. Even though the Peterbilt is actually has an 80,000 lb. GVWR.

The only way no spare is acceptable is if the car comes with Run Flats. But then you have to buy Run Flats forever.

I have to disagree as well. I had them on my Mazdaspeed3 and I loved them. It's true they come on when your windshield is frosty, but it's just one click to turn them off (like it's one click to turn on any manual wipers). They worked flawlessly in all other conditions. They automatically speed up and slow down based…

NO, NO, NO, you can't call it a 427 without a 7 liter Ford engine. That racing engine is too legendary to be used as a marketing strategy. This thing would be awesome with any name, but you don't call on the great 427 when you are using a 302.

This article is all that is right about automotive enthusiasm. The writing is pretty good, too!

Isn't this basically expected when you valet your car? The last time I handed my keys to a valet, I said, "The boost comes on really strong after 3000 rpm, so be ready for it."

So many wants right now.

Most diesel engines do not have a throttle. Engine revs and power output are controlled entirely by the fuel injectors.

I like Lexus' new front end. I think it looks fantastically agressive, especially in person.

These are NOT the engines that were used in the N1 rocket. The N1 rocket used NK-15 engines and the Antares flights use NK-33 engines. These are the final version of the NK-31 engines that had all the refinements to prevent them from behaving like NK-15 engines.

Manual forever.

His license plate is awesome.

It's clear that I won't get through to you. I'm telling you, any airflow relative to an object moving through a fluid is produced by the object propelling itself forward.

You really are an idiot. I'm sorry it has resorted to name calling, but I'm probably the most qualified person when it comes to this topic since I am a FUCKING AERODYNAMICS ENGINEER WHO DESIGNS VEHICLES IN A WIND TUNNEL. You should probably just accept the fact that you're not smart enough to understand.

I'm beginning to think you're hopeless. No matter what your car is powered by, no matter where you put the device, no matter the air flow characteristics, all of the aerodynamic motion must come from expending energy to create velocity. The flappy thing needs to be more than 100% efficient to create additional energy.…

WELL, I see what your problem is, you have a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship between drag and power generation. Please try to realize that I am only trying to help you understand the physics here.

Sir, you have just proved that you don't understand conservation of energy. The energy loss due to drag will ALWAYS be greater than the energy gained by ANY wind power generator. If the energy gain was greater than the drag, the device would be operating at more than 100% efficiency.