Again, facts or you’re just a poser (which is what all evidence suggests).

Strawman again... You could prove it like I did by citing references or explaining how I’m wrong or drawing and posting a diagram, etc.

I understand that to some people, the idea of actually bothering to know stuff is totally weird.

The fact remains that you tried to make an argument out of pure semantics (in the layperson’s use of the term, not the technical one) and you didn’t have the most basic grounding in the facts you were attempting to cite.

I feel like this was pretty standard SOP back in the early 2000s. I had something similar where I found the new car I wanted and spoke to the internet salesperson for a quote and when I went in, they quoted me a minimum price about $5k higher than my quote. However, they had a 125% trade-in value on their trades…

Please show where I said I used C#... (oh right, once again you can’t understand a simple system or present any facts to support your argument)

Uh, that was not an argument. That was you emitting a bunch of word salad.

I’m afraid it is you who is not understanding. I’ve admitted I got the term wrong initially, but my entire argument was not wrong and with the term corrected, there is zero parts wrong with my argument and you have neither refuted my initial position nor proven that you knew the correct term (I mean the fact that your…

The only reason we’re going around in circles is because you’re not actually proving I’m wrong. You pointed out I should Google the right terms but failed to supply any yourself (and it would have been one word), which implied at best that you also didn’t know it.

Nope, again, simply saying “I’m right” is not a fact or an argument (or at least a good one).

You still haven’t proved me wrong... You keep talking about knowing he right answer, but you literally have not proven how I am wrong.

I did know what a subdomain was, that’s the point, I just had the wrong word in my mind, that’s never happened to you? If you replace root site with domain and so forth and everything I said was absolutely correct. But you’re not arguing that my argument was wrong, you’re arguing that I’m flat wrong because I used the…

Again, explain how I got it wrong? If you can’t then I am not wrong. You saying I’m wrong doesn’t make me wrong. You proving I’m wrong would, but you can’t, and you haven’t. Keep trying though.

Everything I said was completely correct except the term I used, which I didn’t feel like googling while on my phone on a train with shitty cell reception at the time, and my explanation of how the sites are set up was exactly correct except for the name.

Jesus are you stupid? I can’t think of another explanation. I was right before and simply didn’t bother to Google the dictionary terms and even admitted it, and somehow you think you’ve scored a point or won an argument? Get out of here with your weak shit and waiting 2-3 days hoping I won’t notice or coming up with a…

Since you piqued my interest enough to Google it: Subdomain

So are you just a side login for the same guy I was arguing before, because you seem like you desperately want to be seen as a know-it-all, yet you seem to not actually contribute any actual facts to the argument.

Duly noted, but key question: am I wrong? No. Thanks for your input days after the fact...

I’m not sure they’re two different things. Deadspin is like the grocery store or target and the Concourse is like one aisle. You’re in the concourse aisle here, but you’re still in fucking deadspin. Again, you’re wrong. But keep going, I’m enjoying your descriptions.

Websites have a hierarchy. Hangouts.google.com is a subsite of google.com. emoteenager42.blogspot.com is a fucking blogspot site. theconcourse.deadspin.com is a fucking deadspin site. If you’ve worked with website design for 20 years, then you must not be very good (or lying) because I don’t really know how to explain…