She didn't ruin the movie. Brett Ratner did.

Neither chris brown nor the girl he had sex with where of age to consent.

I don't think the point being made was about the legal definition of rape. I think it was about how a person is speaking about his experience, and there are an awful lot of other people saying, "No, let us tell you what that experience was."

I have a hard time believing that the laws on minor-minor sex/sexual abuse/rape are as clear as many of the people here believe them to be. But I, like Ms. Braxton have a difficult time equating legal consent with "consent." If a 17yo woman had sex with a 24y0 man, and then she related this fact to us in a positive…

Sharknado

Well, that's because you're an internet commenter. This game looks fantastic! You can't just expect what is, essentially, the beginning of the game to be what the entire game is like. It'll get much more interesting once you acquire weapons and traps and face much more frightening horrors!

its the age of feminism, you cant release anything offending or even cartoonish offending ever again! fun is over. go home. we live in times where even lara croft isnt allowed to be a campy unrealistic nerd sex fantasy anymore.

(Reaction 1)

Mmmmm....bacon...

Some feminists will claim it's something called a "male power fantasy" and that all men want to look that way. In other words, don't generalize us, but we'll feel free to generalize you.

But it's presented that way. That there is a correct and incorrect way to draw "boobies". It's not "How to draw natural boobies". It even makes a crack at how superheroes are generally drawn. If it had been meant for purely informative purposes, it wouldn't have had a comparison, it would have just been a tutorial.

YES!

Regardless of parenting the Teen assaulted his mother, that's major warning lights... if it escalated to murder would you still blame the parent?

The problem might be your eyesight.

"Crotch" wasn't originally an anatomical term; it describes the part of a pair of pants where the inseams meet. We've appropriated it to describe the area of the body covered by that section of pants (whether under or outer), but it's really a tailoring term.

But you're not paying more, which is the point

But I will say the way this artist views women clearly manifests in his work. It's pretty obvious he views women as fighting fuck toys and not equals.

Actually I am a hetereosesual black male, and not every woman ever feels uncomfortable with women showing skin. Some even do it themselves. Secondly, so because someone decides to draw half naked women that automatically means they're an evil sexist? So I guess by that standard if a female artist draws a man…

FEMINISM!!!!