LittleJon
LittleJon
LittleJon

"Cracked up to be". Was that a deliberate pun?

"Sure thing bud". How old are you?

I have a $2500 full frame DSLR and I don't want to always carry that. My wife has a G12 that we use for travel, but I would love for it to have a bigger sensor.

What's shocking is that it's only 8.5% of the US national debt!

I didn't! I'm pretty certain I bought less than $1T.

Nicely done Sir!

Better than an LCD. LCDs (even with LED back lights) waste energy because they work by blocking light. This will only emit the light that is needed for each pixel.

What about the front facing camera? How was that?

What other point and shoot with manual controls and raw capture capability has a sensor that big?

Okay. Thanks for the insight.

Might be time to sell the X100 and upgrade!

SSRIs already have been shown to promote neurogenesis in the hippocampus (which I think is a summer camp for horses) and that's been postulated as the reason they work.

No, I'm not a Canon fanboy, even if I do have a bias towards them because I know their control scheme and UI, so can pick up any Canon and use it right away without the controls getting in my way.

Not when needing to travel light.

I'll join those saying the Spitfire is the better looking plane. Those elliptical wings look so much better than the Mustang's, which look like the ends were chopped off.

I have an X100. I also have a 5D Mark II. My wife has a T3i and a G12. I will replace her G12 with this.

I think it's a bargain!

Oh, cool! I could attach these to pens, as I can never find one around my apartment. And on books of mail stamps, they always go missing too. Then there's paperclips. I mean, who can ever locate one when you need to?

I think the guy got beaten up while wasted.

I've wanted something like this for ages. Back lit transparencies look amazing. The only problem is they're normally made only for commercial uses and so are very expensive.